Davis v. Apfel, Docket No. 97-6243

Decision Date16 July 1998
Docket NumberDocket No. 97-6243
Citation145 F.3d 572
PartiesMark DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit

Christopher James Bowes, Center for Disability Advocacy Rights, Inc., New York City, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Linda A. Riffkin, Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, New York City, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: WINTER, Chief Judge, McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge, and SHADUR, * District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Mark Davis appeals from Judge Scheindlin's grant of judgment on the pleadings for the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") and denial, on the ground that he had not established his asthma was a disability, of Davis's claim for disability insurance benefits. On appeal, Davis restates his arguments to the district court, namely that the proposed regulation that changed the Commissioner's definition of a disability due to asthma was not properly noticed and was otherwise arbitrary, that the Administrative Law Judge's ("ALJ's") decision erroneously relied on a report authored by a doctor now subject to disciplinary proceedings, and that the ALJ erred, for a number of reasons, when she determined that Davis was not disabled. We affirm for substantially the reasons stated in Judge Scheindlin's opinion, Davis v. Callahan, 96 Civ. 9367(SAS), 1997 WL 438772 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 1997).

* The Honorable Milton I. Shadur, of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Echevarria v. Apfel
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • 11 d2 Maio d2 1999
    ... ... Dist. LEXIS 1549, at *31-*32 (S.D.N.Y. Feb ... Page 294 ... 11, 1998); Davis v. Callahan, No. 96 Civ. 9367(SAS), 1997 WL 438772, at *11, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11256, at ... ...
  • Moronta v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • 30 d1 Setembro d1 2019
    ...same," given that "the limitations in issue do not affect Plaintiff's ability to perform sedentary work"), aff'd sub nom. Davis v. Apfel, 145 F.3d 572 (2d Cir. 1998). Indeed, notwithstanding the ALJ's somewhat careless language, it appears that she relied on Dr. Mann's Record Review primari......
  • Pantojas v. Apfel, 98 Civ. 3391 (LAK).
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • 16 d4 Março d4 2000
    ... ... See Davis v. Callahan, No. 96 Civ. 9367(SAS), 1997 WL 438772, at *9 (S.D.N.Y. Aug.4, 1997), aff'd, 145 F.3d ... ...
  • Davis v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of New York
    • 30 d3 Outubro d3 2019
    ...be harmless. See e.g., Davis v. Callahan, No. 96 CIV. 9367, 1997 WL 438772, at *12 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 1997), aff'd sub nom. Davis v. Apfel, 145 F.3d 572 (2d Cir. 1998) (ALJ's error in not explaining the weight afforded to non-examining physicians' opinion harmless because "whether or not the......
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Social Security Issues Annotated. Vol. II - 2014 Contents
    • 3 d0 Agosto d0 2014
    ...301.2, 504.4, 604.6, 1301.2 Davis v. Apfel, 133 F. Supp.2d 542 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 14, 2001), §§ 301.2, 607.1, 607.2, 1301.2 Davis v. Apfel , 145 F.3d 572 (2d Cir. 1998), § 318.1 Davis v. Apfel, 149 F. Supp.2d 99 (D. Del. June 27, 2001), §§ 106.2, 202.9 Davis v. Apfel, 239 F.3d 962 (8th Cir. F......
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Bohr's Social Security Issues Annotated - Volume II
    • 4 d1 Maio d1 2015
    ...301.2, 504.4, 604.6, 1301.2 Davis v. Apfel, 133 F. Supp.2d 542 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 14, 2001), §§ 301.2, 607.1, 607.2, 1301.2 Davis v. Apfel , 145 F.3d 572 (2d Cir. 1998), § 318.1 Davis v. Apfel, 149 F. Supp.2d 99 (D. Del. June 27, 2001), §§ 106.2, 202.9 Davis v. Apfel, 239 F.3d 962 (8th Cir. F......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT