U.S. v. Sanchez-Valencia, SANCHEZ-VALENCI
| Decision Date | 05 August 1998 |
| Docket Number | SANCHEZ-VALENCI,D,No. 98-8167,98-8167 |
| Parties | 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1696 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ramiroefendant-Appellant. Non-Argument Calendar. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit |
Brian Mendelsohn, Federal Defender Program, Inc., Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Janet S. King, U.S. Atty., Charysse L. Alexander, Asst. U.S. Atty., Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.
Before GODBOLD, HILL and FAY, Senior Circuit Judges.
Ramiro Sanchez-Valencia appeals his 66-month sentence for illegally re-entering the United States after being deported.
On appeal, Sanchez-Valencia argues that the district court erroneously believed that it did not have the authority to downwardly depart on the basis of cultural assimilation, and that such a departure was warranted.
This Court has held that a district court's discretionary refusal to depart downward is not appealable, unless the refusal was based on an erroneous belief that the court did not have the statutory authority to depart from the guideline range. United States v. Fossett, 881 F.2d 976, 979 (11th Cir.1989).
We have reviewed the transcripts, the presentence investigation report, the judgment and commitment order, and all other relevant portions of the record. Those, together with the briefs of the parties, demonstrate that the sentencing judge was aware of his authority to depart in light of United States v. Lipman, 133 F.3d 726 (9th Cir.1998).
While it is possible to determine from this record that the district court was aware of its authority, it would facilitate review if sentencing judges would state on the record that they believe they have or do not have the authority to depart.
AFFIRMED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
U.S. v. De La Mata
...only if the district court erroneously believed it did not have the statutory authority to do so. See United States v. Sanchez-Valencia, 148 F.3d 1273, 1274 (11th Cir. 1998). Fernandez contends that the district court wholly failed to address the grounds for his request, and thus, was ambig......
-
U.S. v. Rivas-Gonzalez, 03-30167.
...F.3d 429, 432 (5th Cir.2001) (holding that cultural assimilation is a permitted ground for departure); United States v. Sanchez-Valencia, 148 F.3d 1273 (11th Cir.1998) (holding that sentencing judge was aware of his authority to depart in light of Lipman); United States v. Reyes-Campos, 293......
-
U.S. v. Dudley, No. 06-11146. Non-Argument Calendar.
...judges would state on the record that they believe they have or do not have the authority to depart," United States v. Sanchez-Valencia, 148 F.3d 1273, 1274 (11th Cir.1998), but we have never said that such a statement is required. Instead, we have held that "when nothing in the record indi......
-
U.S. v. Martinez-Alvarez, 02-CR-223.
...which to grant a downward departure. E.g., United States v. Rodriguez-Montelongo, 263 F.3d 429 (5th Cir.2001); United States v. Sanchez-Valencia, 148 F.3d 1273 (11th Cir.1998); United States v. Lipman, 133 F.3d 726 (9th It is important to first distinguish this basis for departure from two ......
-
Blame It on the Government: A Justification for the Disparate Treatment of Departures Based on Cultural Ties
...the issue of cultural assimilation, but describing the relevant standard for such a departure); United States v. Sanchez-Valencia, 148 F.3d 1273, 1274 (11th Cir. 1998) (noting that the district court’s denial of a departure on American assimilation grounds is not subject to appellate review......
-
Federal Sentencing Guidelines - James T. Skuthan and Rosemary T. Cakmis
...of Miller, see supra text accompanying notes 75-78. 235. 146 F.3d at 1284. 236. Id. at 1285. 237. Id. at 1286. 238. Id. 239. Id. 240. 148 F.3d 1273 (11th Cir. 1998). 241. Id. at 1274. 242. Id. 243. 143 F.3d 1401 (11th Cir. 1998). 244. Id. at 1403. 245. Id. at 1405. 246. Id. at 1404. 247. Id......