149 F.3d 1188 (8th Cir. 1998), 98-1269, U.S. v. Jaramillo-Martinez

• Citation: 149 F.3d 1188
• Party Name: UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Nelson De Jesus JARAMILLO-MARTINEZ, Appellant.
• Case Date: June 05, 1998
• Court: United States Courts of Appeals, U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit

Page 1188

149 F.3d 1188 (8th Cir. 1998)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,

v.

Nelson De Jesus JARAMILLO-MARTINEZ, Appellant.

No. 98-1269.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

June 5, 1998

Editorial Note:

This opinion appears in the Federal reporter in a table titled "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions". (See FI CTA8 Rule 28A, FI CTA8 IOP and FI CTA8 APP. I regarding use of unpublished opinions)

Submitted June 3, 1998.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Before BOWMAN, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Nelson De Jesus Jaramillo-Martinez (Martinez) pleaded guilty to possessing with the intent to distribute cocaine hydrochloride, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (1994). Because he possessed 11.18 kilograms of cocaine when apprehended, he was subject to a statutory mandatory minimum sentence of 120 months imprisonment. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A) (where offense involves 5 or more kilograms of cocaine, person is subject to sentence of at least 10 years imprisonment). Martinez maintained that he qualified for the "safety valve," see U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5C1.2 (1997), and thus should be sentenced within the 87-to-108-month guidelines imprisonment range which would otherwise have applied. After hearing testimony at sentencing, however, the District Court ¹ concluded that Martinez had not truthfully provided all the information he had about the offense, denied him safety-valve relief, and sentenced him to 120 months imprisonment and five years supervised release. Martinez appeals, and we affirm.

We agree with the government that the District Court did not clearly err in finding that Martinez had not truthfully provided all the information he had about the instant offense, and that thus Martinez did not qualify for the safety valve. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(5) (1994) (court shall impose sentence pursuant to guidelines without regard to any statutory minimum sentence if court finds at sentencing, among other things, that "the defendant has truthfully provided to the Government all information and evidence the defendant has concerning the offense"); U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5C1.2(5) (1997) (same); United States v. Romo, 81 F.3d 84, 86 (8th Cir.1996) (standard of review). Martinez failed to show that he had satisfied this requirement: the District Court credited a police...