Nix v. Hedden
| Decision Date | 10 May 1893 |
| Docket Number | No. 137,137 |
| Citation | 13 S.Ct. 881,149 U.S. 304,37 L.Ed. 745 |
| Parties | NIX et al. v. HEDDEN, Collector |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
At law. Action by John Nix, John W. Nix, George W. Nix, and Frank W. Nix against Edward L. Hedden, collector of the port of New York, to recover back duties paid under protest. Judgment on verdict directed for defendant. 39 Fed. Rep. 109. Plaintiffs bring error. Affirmed.
Statement by Mr. Justice GRAY:
This was an action brought February 4, 1887, against the collector of the port of New York to recover back duties paid under protest on tomatoes imported by the plaintiff from the West Indies in the spring of 1886, which the collector assessed under 'Schedule G.—Provisions,' of the tariff act of March 3, 1883, (chapter 121,) imposing a duty on 'vegetables in their natural state, or in salt or brine, not specially enumerated or provided for in this act, ten per centum ad valorem;' and which the plaintiffs contended came within the clause in the free list of the same act, 'Fruits, green, ripe, or dried, not specially enumerated or provided for in this act.' 22 Stat. 504, 519.
At the trial the plaintiff's counsel, after reading in evidence definitions of the words 'fruit' and 'vegetables' from Webster's Dictionary, Worcester's Dictionary, and the Imperial Dictionary, called two witnesses, who had been for 30 years in the business of selling fruit and vegetables, and asked them, after hearing these definitions, to say whether these words had 'any special meaning in trade or commerce, different from those read.'
One of the witnesses answered as follows: 'Well, it does not classify all things there, but they are correct as far as they go. It does not take all kinds of fruit or vegetables; it takes a portion of them. I think the words 'fruit' and 'vegetable' have the same meaning in trade to-day that they had on March 1, 1883. I understand that the term 'fruit' is applied in trade only to such plants or parts of plants as contain the seeds. There are more vegetables than those in the enumeration given in Webster's Dictionary under the term 'vegetable,' as 'cabbage, cauliflower, turnips, potatoes, peas, beans, and the like,' probably covered by the words 'and the like."
The other witness testified: 'I don't think the term 'fruit' or the term 'vegetables' had, in March, 1883, and prior thereto, any special meaning in trade and commerce in this country different from that which I have read here from the dictionaries.'
The plaintiff's counsel then read in evidence from the same dictionaries the definitions of the word 'tomato.'
The defendant's counsel then read in evidence from Webster's Dictionary the definitions of the words 'pea,' 'egg plant,' 'cucumber,' 'squash,' and 'pepper.'
The plaintiff then read in evidence from Webster's and Worcester's dictionaries the definitions of 'potato,' 'turnip,' 'parsnip,' 'cauliflower,' 'cabbage,' 'carrot,' and 'bean.'
No other evidence was offered by either party. The court, upon the defendant's motion, directed a verdict for him, which was returned, and judgment rendered thereon. 39 Fed. Rep. 109. The plaintiffs duly excepted to the instruction, and sued out this writ of error.
Edwin B. Smith, for plaintiffs in error.
Asst. Atty. Gen. Maury, for defendant in error.
Mr. Justice GRAY, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court.
The single question in this case is whether tomatoes, considered as provisions, are to be classed as 'vegetables' or as 'fruit,' within the meaning of the tariff act of 1883.
The only witnesses called...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Northwest Magnesite Co.
... ... 8 S.Ct. 714, 31 L.Ed. 643, holds that a designation of an ... article of commerce by merchants and importers, when clearly ... established, determines the construction of a revenue law ... when that article is mentioned ... In ... Nix v. Hedden, 149 U.S. 304, 13 S.Ct. 881, 37 L.Ed ... 745, the question presented was whether tomatoes were to be ... classed as fruit or vegetables under the tariff act. The ... court found no particular help from the witnesses called, and ... decided the point through the use of a ... ...
-
Cybor Corp. v. FAS Technologies, Inc.
...are admitted, not as evidence, but only as aids to the memory and understanding of the court." Nix v. Hedden, 149 U.S. 304, 306-07, 13 S.Ct. 881, 882, 37 L.Ed. 745 (1893). The effort is to understand the meaning of the terms in the claims. To the extent that involves delving into factual ma......
-
Bronx Household of Faith v. Board of Educ., Ny
...the importance of identifying "which of . . . various indicia of similarity is the relevant one"). See generally Nix v. Hedden, 149 U.S. 304, 13 S.Ct. 881, 37 L.Ed. 745 (1893) (determining whether tomatoes should be classified as "fruit" or "vegetable" by first defining "fruit" and "vegetab......
-
In re Section 301 Cases
...Courts have long considered dictionary definitions to discern the ordinary meaning of a term. See, e.g. , Nix v. Hedden , 149 U.S. 304, 306–07, 13 S.Ct. 881, 37 L.Ed. 745 (1893) ; Gumpenberger v. Wilkie , 973 F.3d 1379, 1382 (Fed. Cir. 2020).18 Plaintiffs also argue that "[t]he magnitude of......
-
Shakespeare in the Law
...spoiled and unmarketable garbage. In common parlance tomatoes are vegetables, as the Supreme Court observed long a o, see Nix v. Hedden, 149 U.S. 304, 307,13 S.Ct. 881, 882,37 L.Ed. 745 (1893), although botanically speaking they are actually a fruit. 26 Encyclopedia Americana 832 (Intl. ed.......
-
Status Check: Should the Federal Tax Status of a Disregarded Debtor Be Property of the Estate?
...purpose of the check-the-box regulations in favor of using general judicial tools of interpretation is disfavored.).152. Nix v. Hedden, 149 U.S. 304, 307 (1893) ("[D]ictionaries are admitted, not as evidence, but only as aids to the memory and understanding of the court. ")153. See, e.g., Y......
-
ORDINARY MEANING AND ORDINARY PEOPLE.
...of the ordinary meaning presumption. The Court has famously chosen ordinary over technical meaning in some cases such as Nix v. Hedden, 149 U.S. 304, 306-07 (1893). But in many other cases, such as Bostock v. Clayton County, 140 S. Ct. 1731 (2020), the Court has chosen technical meaning, of......
-
UNPLANNED OBSOLESCENCE: INTERPRETING THE AUTOMATIC TELEPHONE DIALING SYSTEM AFTER THE SMARTPHONE EPOCH.
...[https://perma.cc/N8TU-MQZ5]. (204.) See, e.g., Chapman v. United States, 500 U.S. 453, 462 (1991); Nix v. Hedden, 149 U.S. 304(1893). (205.) Cf. Smith v. United States, 508 U.S. 223,242-45 (1993) (Scalia, J., (206.) See Deal v. United States, 508 U.S. 129, 132 (1993) ("[It is a] fundamenta......