Savannah Sugar Refining Corp. v. Atlantic Towing Co.
Decision Date | 23 October 1926 |
Docket Number | No. 4887.,4887. |
Citation | 15 F.2d 648 |
Parties | SAVANNAH SUGAR REFINING CORPORATION et al. v. ATLANTIC TOWING CO. et al. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Geo. T. Cann, Robert M. Hitch, and A. B. Lovett, all of Savannah, Ga., and John M. Woolsey, of New York City, for appellants.
T. M. Cunningham, Jr., and Walter C. Hartridge, both of Savannah, Ga., and Earl Farwell and James K. Symmers, both of New York City, for appellees.
Before WALKER, BRYAN, and FOSTER, Circuit Judges.
The steamship Silverway and her cargo of sugar were libeled for alleged salvage services rendered. The court, by its decree entered June 3, 1926, awarded to libelants $16,850 for salvage services rendered to the Silverway, her cargo, and pending freight, and prorated that amount according to salved values found, with the result that the sum of $4,653 was adjudged against the claimant of the Silverway and its surety, and the sum of $12,197 was adjudged against the claimant of the cargo and its surety, with interest on those sums from the date of the decree. The claimant of the cargo and its surety appealed from the decree, which is complained of on the grounds: (1) That the amount awarded was excessive; and (2) that the court erred in holding that the cargo was primarily liable for any part of the amount properly allowable as salvage.
After the libel was filed, and after the steamship and the cargo had been released upon the giving of bonds, with surety, by the respective claimants thereof, the cargo owner filed a petition which prayed that the owner of the Silverway and its charterer be made parties, and that the amount of any salvage awards to which the libelants might be found to be entitled be decreed to be paid in the first instance by the Silverway and her charterer. That petition asserted the claim that the Silverway was unseaworthy by reason of not being equipped with adequate charts and sailing directions on her voyage from Cuba to Savannah, which was in progress when she stranded, that the stranding of the Silverway was due to such unseaworthiness, and that such unseaworthiness was a violation of the contract of affreightment under which the cargo was accepted and carried. There was no service of process under that petition, and the parties so sought to be brought in did not appear or respond to it.
The following statements contained in an opinion rendered by the District Judge are supported by the record:
The ship sustained no damage, except from a slight injury to her engines, due to sucking in sand while she was aground. Two hawsers supplied by tugs engaged in the service broke during the pulling operations, and new hawsers were supplied and used. There was evidence as to the loss resulting from the injury to the hawsers, but there was no finding as to the value of those hawsers,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Evanow v. M/V Neptune
...is thus liable on a pro rata basis. Stratton v. Jarvis, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 4, 10-11, 8 L.Ed. 846 (1834); Savannah Sugar Ref. Corp. v. Atlantic Towing Co., 15 F.2d 648, 650 (5th Cir.1926). Therefore, one could argue that a salvage contract award should be offset by the proportion of the overal......
-
Atlantic Towing Co. v. The Caliche, 475
...evidence. The court judicially knows that undervaluation for tax purposes in Georgia is common. See The Silverway, Savannah Sugar Refining Corp. v. Atlantic Towing Co., 5 Cir., 15 F.2d 648. The barge was new, its recent cost shown. Other like equipment to the barge may have been available, ......
-
United States v. Phillips, 286
...given due consideration to them, though we consider tax returns unsatisfactory evidence of value. See Savannah Sugar Ref. Corp. v. Atlantic Towing Co., 5 Cir., 15 F.2d 648(1), 650; Atlantic Towing Co. v. The Caliche, D.C., 47 F.Supp. 610(1), Let separate judgments for the respective land-ow......
-
Northwestern Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Wiggins
... ... Atlantic Co. v. James, 94 U. S. 207, 24 L. Ed. 112; ... ...