Baxter v. Ford Motor Co.
| Decision Date | 13 October 1932 |
| Docket Number | 23749. |
| Citation | 15 P.2d 1118,168 Wash. 456 |
| Parties | Sam BAXTER, Appellant, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al., Respondents. |
| Court | Washington Supreme Court |
Appeal from Superior Court, Lewis County; George D. Simpson, Judge.
Smith & Davies, of Centralia, for appellant.
Hull & Murray, of Chehalis, and Battle, Hulbert & Helsell, Whittemore & Truscott, and Shank, Belt, Fairbrook & Rode, all of Seattle, for respondents.
Upon a rehearing en banc, a majority of the court adheres to the departmental opinion heretofore filed herein and reported in 12 P.2d 409. The judgment is therefore reversed, with directions to grant a new trial with reference to respondent Ford Motor Company, and affirmed as to respondent St. John Motors.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Pabellon v. Grace Line
... ... MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co., 217 N.Y. 382, 111 N.E. 1050, L.R.A. 1916F, 696; Campo v. Scofield, 301 N.Y. 468, 95 N.E.2d ... 1497; Schuylerville Wall Paper Co. v. American Mfg. Co., 272 App.Div. 856, 70 N.Y.S.2d 166; Baxter v. Ford Motor Co., 168 Wash. 456, 12 P.2d 409, 15 P.2d 1118, 88 A.L.R. 521, with annotation at 527 ... ...
-
Putman v. Erie City Manufacturing Company
... ... of place to observe that a nation with a hundred and fifty million people who own millions of motor cars, should be protected by the same public policy that protects the user of deleterious food." 4 ... Buick Motor Co., 1916, 217 N.Y. 382, 111 N.E. 1050. In Ford Motor Company v. Mathis, 5 Cir. 1963, 322 F.2d 267, this court, using the language of ... § 40A-2-318; Esborg v. Bailey Drug Co., 1963, 61 Wash. 2d 347, 378 P.2d 298; Baxter v. Ford Motor Co., 1932, 168 Wash. 456, 12 P. 2d 409, 15 P.2d 1118, 88 A.L.R. 521. See also Deveny ... ...
-
Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.
... ... They wanted to buy a car and were considering a Ford or a Chevrolet as well as a Plymouth. They were shown a Plymouth which appealed to them and the ... I hereby certify that no credit has been extended to me for the purchase of this motor vehicle except as appears in writing on the face of this agreement ... [161 A.2d 74] 'I have ... As far back as 1932, in the well known case of Baxter v. Ford Motor Co., 168 Wash. 456, 12 P.2d 409 (Sup.Ct.1932), affirmed 15 P.2d 1118, 88 A.L.R. 521 ... ...
-
Lartigue v. RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company
... ... MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co., 1916, 217 N.Y. 382, 111 N.E. 1050, L.R.A.1916F, 696. When the claim is based on breach of ... Baxter" v. Ford Motor Co., 1932, 168 Wash. 456, 12 P.2d 409, 15 P.2d 1118, 88 A.L. R. 521 ... \xC2" ... ...