National Labor Relations Board v. Marquette Metal Products Co.
| Decision Date | 14 January 1946 |
| Docket Number | No. 9991.,9991. |
| Parties | NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. MARQUETTE METAL PRODUCTS CO. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit |
David A. Morse, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
W. R. Price, of Cleveland, Ohio, for respondent.
Before ALLEN and MARTIN, Circuit Judges, and MILLER, District Judge.
This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel;
And it appearing that there is substantial evidence to support the Board's finding that the respondent engaged in unfair labor practices within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act, Title 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq., 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq.; and it appearing that the conduct of respondent's supervisory employees constituted interference, restraint and coercion in violation of the Act; H. J. Heinz Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 311 U.S. 514, 518, 519, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309; National Labor Relations Board v. M. A. Hanna Co., 6 Cir., 125 F.2d 786, 788: It is ordered that a decree issue enforcing the order of the National Labor Relations Board as prayed in the petition.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
National Labor Rel. Bd. v. Packard Motor Car Co.
...Association of Machinists v. National Labor Relations Board, 311 U.S. 72, 61 S.Ct. 83, 85 L.Ed. 50; National Labor Relations Board v. Marquette Metal Products Co., 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 964; National Labor Relations Board v. Link-Belt Co., 311 U.S. 584, 598, 61 S.Ct. 358, 85 L.Ed. 368. This is t......