Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Food & Drug Admin.
| Decision Date | 14 August 1998 |
| Docket Number | 97-1606,97-1581,Nos. 97-1604,97-1614 and 97-1605,s. 97-1604 |
| Citation | 153 F.3d 155 |
| Parties | BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION; Lorillard Tobacco Company; Philip Morris, Incorporated; RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Coyne Beahm, Incorporated; Liggett Group, Incorporated, Plaintiffs, v. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION; David A. Kessler, M.D., Commissioner of Food and Drugs, Defendants-Appellees. Attorneys General of the State of Minnesota; State of Alaska; State of Arizona; State of Arkansas; State of Colorado; State of Connecticut; State of Florida; State of Hawaii; State of Illinois; State of Indiana; State of Iowa; State of Louisiana; State of Kansas; State of Maine; State of Maryland; State of Massachusetts; State of Michigan; State of Mississippi; State of Missouri; State of Montana; State of Nevada; State of New Hampshire; State of New Jersey; State of New Mexico; State of New York; State of North Dakota; State of Ohio; State of Oklahoma; State of Oregon; State of Pennsylvania; State of Rhode Island; State of South Dakota; State of Texas; State of Utah; State of Vermont; State of Washington; State of West Virginia; State of Wisconsin; The City and County of San Francisco; Public Citizen; The American Academy of Pediatrics; American Cancer Society; American College of Preventive Medicine; American Heart Association; American Lung Association; American Medical Association; American Medical Women's Association; American Public Health Association; American Society of Addiction Medicine; The HMO Group; National Association of Elementary School Principals; National Association of Secondary School Principals; National Center for Tobacco-Free Kids; State of Kentucky; Washington Legal Foundation ("WLF"); Mario Andretti; Don Garlits; Al Unser; Rusty Wallace; Cale Yarborough; Richard Burr, Cass Ballenger, Howard Coble, United States Representatives, Lauch Faircloth, United States Senator, Amici Curiae. COYNE BEAHM, INCORPORATED; Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation; Philip Morris, Incorporated; RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company; National Assoc |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit |
To continue reading
Request your trial
43 cases
-
Chamber of Commerce of U.S. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
... ... 7 Judge Henderson, joined by Judge Brown, wrote a concurrence, opining that the Board also ... framework under which to analyze the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) power to ... See Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. FDA, 153 F.3d 155, 161 (4th ... ...
-
Association of Amer. Phys. v. U.S. Food and Drug
... ... Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 133, 120 S.Ct ... ...
-
Elm Grove Coal Co. v. Director, O.W.C.P.
... ... See United States v. Mead Corp., 533 U.S. 218, 226-27, 121 S.Ct. 2164, 150 ... consideration of other relevant statutes." Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. FDA, 153 F.3d 155, ... ...
-
F.D.A. v Brown & Williamson Tobacco
... ... FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION et al., Petitioners ... BROWN & WILLIAMSON CO CORP. et al ... No. 98-1152 ... SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ... Cf. Breyer, Judicial Review of Questions of Law and Policy, 38 Admin. L. Rev. 363, 370 (1986) ("A court may also ask whether the legal question ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Statutory Structure.
...28, 1996) (asserting jurisdiction over cigarettes and smokeless tobacco products). (255.) See Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. FDA, 153 F.3d 155, 163-67 (4th Cir. (256.) Brown & Williamson, 529 U.S. at 125-26, 133. (257.) Id. at 133-36. For instance, the Food and Drug Administrat......
-
Current Decisions.
...and Smokeless Tobacco to Protect Children and Adolescents." Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Food and Drug Administration, 153 F.3d 155 (1998), rehearing denied, 161 F.3d 764 (4th Cir. 1998), cert. granted, 119 S.Ct. 1495 The proposed regulations restricted the sale and distribution ......