U.S. v. Oakley, 98-1619

Decision Date18 August 1998
Docket NumberNo. 98-1619,98-1619
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Robert Eugene OAKLEY, Appellant.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit

James Whalen, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Des Moines, IA, argued (Nicholas T. Drees, on the brief), for Appellant.

Erin K. Burke, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Des Moines, IA, argued (Robert C. Dopf, on the brief), for Appellee.

Before LOKEN, GODBOLD, 1 and HEANEY, Circuit Judges.

HEANEY, Circuit Judge.

Robert Oakley appeals the district court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained by a police officer incident to a warrantless arrest of Oakley. Oakley contends that the officer lacked probable cause to arrest him and that the evidence, as the fruit of an illegal search, was inadmissible. We affirm.

On August 29, 1997, at approximately 2:10 p.m., an African American male robbed a Des Moines, Iowa, bank of $11,766. During the robbery, he carried a gun and wore blue jeans and a dark baseball cap. At approximately 3:00 p.m., Des Moines police lieutenant Kelly Willis heard on his car radio that the robbery suspect was seen in the area of the Iowa Historical Building, approximately twelve blocks from where the bank robbery occurred.

Willis drove toward the area around the Historical Building to help with the search. The initial radio dispatch described the bank robber as an African American male, about 6'1", 180 pounds, and wearing dark jeans and a baseball hat. As Willis approached the Historical Building, the radio dispatcher updated the suspect's description because a person fitting that description had been seen changing clothing across the street from the Historical Building at the Bargain Buddies store. According to the dispatcher, the person had put on shorts and a gold-colored T-shirt and had been seen placing a handgun in a black backpack.

After searching the Historical Building and visiting nearby establishments, including Bargain Buddies, Willis saw Oakley, who was wearing a gold shirt, khaki shorts, and carrying a black backpack. Oakley crossed the street away from Willis, who followed him. When the two men were approximately 35 to 40 yards apart, Willis showed the police badge at his hip and said to Oakley, "police officer, I would like to talk to you." Rather than stopping, Oakley turned away and kept walking. According to Willis, he was no longer able to see the front of Oakley's backpack when Oakley started walking away from Willis. Having received information that the backpack contained a gun, Willis pulled his gun, ran after Oakley, and when he was about ten to fifteen feet away, warned Oakley to stop or he would shoot. Oakley turned around with his hands out and Willis took Oakley to the ground. Willis arrested Oakley. As part of a search incident to Oakley's arrest, police officers found $46, a billfold, and a key ring in Oakley's pockets. When searching his backpack, officers found a pellet gun, clothing, and $11,760 in cash.

On August 29, 1997, Oakley was charged with armed bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2113(a) and (d). On October 14, 1997, Oakley filed a motion to suppress evidence seized during the search of his person and backpack. On November 3, 1997, the district court ruled that the police had probable cause for the arrest and search of Oakley. On November 18, 1997, Oakley entered a conditional plea of guilty to the armed robbery charge. Under the terms of his plea, Oakley reserved the right to appeal the district court's adverse ruling on his motion to suppress. On February 6,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • State v. Byrd
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Washington
    • October 10, 2013
    ...searched under Robinson, if the arrestee has actual possession of it at the time of a lawful custodial arrest. See United States v. Oakley, 153 F.3d 696, 697–98 (8th Cir.1998) (backpack); United States v. Tavolacci, 895 F.2d 1423, 1428–29 (D.C.Cir.1990) (luggage); Carter v. State, 367 Md. 4......
  • State v. Carrawell
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • January 12, 2016
    ...justification under Chimel if the arrestee has actual possession of the item at the time of a lawful arrest. See United States v. Oakley, 153 F.3d 696, 697–98 (8th Cir.1998) (backpack); United States v. Tavolacci, 895 F.2d 1423, 1428–29 (D.C.Cir.1990) (luggage); Carter v. State, 367 Md. 447......
  • United States v. Perry
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit)
    • November 15, 2018
    ...In the circumstances, a reasonable officer could have concluded that Perry was the shooter from the bar. See United States v. Oakley , 153 F.3d 696, 697–98 (8th Cir. 1998) ; see also Wesby , 138 S.Ct. at 588 (explaining that it is a mistake to assess probable cause "view[ing] each fact in i......
  • Bell v. Neukirch
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Missouri
    • March 21, 2019
    ...similarities between the two juveniles and the fact that Plaintiff was found so close to the original scene. See United States v. Oakley , 153 F.3d 696, 697 (8th Cir. 1998) (finding probable cause existed where race, height, weight, pants, and hat matched the suspect's description, and the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT