Lutcher v. United States

Decision Date08 April 1895
Docket NumberNo. 271,271
PartiesLUTCHER et al. v. UNITED STATES
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

J. L. Bradford, for plaintiffs in error.

Sol. Gen. Conrad, for the United States.

Mr. Chief Justice FULLER.

This was an action brought by the United States in the circuit court of the United States for the Eastern district of Texas against the firm of Lutcher & Moore, of that district, doing a milling and manufacturing business at Orange, tex., to recover damages for cutting, carrying away, and converting to their own use certain timber, the property of the United States. Judgment was rendered in favor of the United States, March 11, 1891. April 3, 1891, a writ of error was allowed from the circuit court of appeals for the Fifth circuit. The record does not disclose what proceedings were had thereon in that court. July 2, 1891, a writ of error from this court was sued out and filed, the bond thereon being approved and the citation signed July 10, 1891. The petition for the allowance of the writ states that the circuit court of appeals refused to allow the cause to be docketed and the transcript of record to be filed therein, on the ground that the cause should have been taken to this court, and not to that court. But the last clause of section 6 of the judiciary act of March 3, 1891, refers to the circuit court of appeals, and not to the circuit court; and this writ of error is to the circuit court, and not to the circuit court of appeals, and does not therefore reach the proceedings in the latter court. We perceive no ground on which this court has jurisdiction to review the judgment of the circuit court on this writ, and, moreover, it was brought too late. Cincinnati Safe & Lock Co. v. Grand Rapids Safety Deposit Co., 146 U. S. 54, 13 Sup. Ct. 13. Either objection is fatal.

Writ of error dismissed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Mcdaniel v. Mcelvy
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 3 Mayo 1926
    ... ... Within the limitations ... imposed by the Constitution of the United States, every state ... possesses exclusive jurisdiction over the persons and ... property in its ... ...
  • Leahy v. State Treasurer of Oklahoma
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • 18 Junio 1935
    ... ... the state; and, further, since under the authority of said ... act the United States holds said resources in trust for said ... tribe, the act of the state in attempting to ... ...
  • Leahy v. State Treasurer of Okla.
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • 18 Junio 1935
  • Southern Pine Co. v. Hall
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 20 Noviembre 1900
    ...105 F. 84 SOUTHERN PINE CO. v. HALL. No. 815.United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.November 20, 1900 [105 F. 85] ... This ... case ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT