Knox v. Anderson, Civ. No. 1382.
Citation | 159 F. Supp. 795 |
Decision Date | 17 February 1958 |
Docket Number | Civ. No. 1382. |
Parties | Roger I. KNOX, Plaintiff, v. J. Leland ANDERSON, Defendant. |
Court | United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Court (Hawaii) |
Smith, Wild, Beebe & Cades, J. Russell Cades, William B. Borthwick, Honolulu, Hawaii, for plaintiff.
Robertson, Castle & Anthony, J. Garner Anthony, William F. Quinn, Honolulu, Hawaii, Tannenbaum, Steinberg & Shearer, Bertram Fields, Beverly Hills, Cal., for defendant.
Is the purchase of $150,000 of life insurance a "do-it-yourself" project?
In 1952 Roger I. Knox, 38, a professional biologist and graduate of Stanford University, lived with his wife Ellen and their three young children on the "Valley Isle" of Maui, 70 miles from metropolitan Honolulu. Maui, with its volcanic soil, is a sugar producing island of the Hawaiian group. Knox was employed on one of the sugar plantations as a field superintendent. He was in 1952 earning a salary of $8,100 a year and had an income of approximately $1,500 from investments. Like other plantation executives Knox and his family lived in a rent-free company house, had a gardener furnished him to care for its surrounding two acres, and was supplied with the use of a company automobile. His position in plantation society seemed economically secure. Knox looked forward hopefully to the day when he would be promoted to assistant manager of his plantation at a salary of $12,000 a year.
Son of a beekeeper, J. Leland Anderson, former Mormon missionary and once a Real Silk salesman, had been in the insurance business for 25 years principally in the Los Angeles area where he resides. His specialty was selling bank financed insurance. In the past eight years he had "delivered" twenty-five million dollars of insurance so financed. When his wife persuaded him to take a vacation, their visit to the Hawaiian Islands proved little solace to him. The fabled charms of Polynesia left his one great desire unaffected. He wished only to sell more insurance. While other vacationers lolled and enjoyed the sun Anderson investigated the area for contacts. He became convinced that Hawaii could use his service of bank financed insurance. To this end Anderson returned to the Islands after his vacation, and in 1952 established an office in Honolulu, which was essentially the same in organization as the one he maintained in Los Angeles. The basic ingredients were Anderson's abilities as a salesman and the bank connections of his associate, William Van de Carr, which enabled loans to be put through once Anderson had sold the program.
Bank financed insurance is not a revolutionary concept. The method prescribes a bank loan. Instead of the loan being paid to the borrower it is utilized by the bank to pay his insurance premiums as they become due. Under the present tax law the interest paid to the bank on the loan is deductible for income tax purposes, and the saving thus incurred can be used to purchase additional insurance coverage if desired. The amount of this saving depends on the tax bracket of the insured. Below the 40% bracket his savings would be negligible and below 30% non-existent. When Anderson applied to the Insurance Commissioner for a license to sell bank financed insurance in Hawaii he was warned about selling procedures, especially where the client was a family man on a fixed income.
In the field Anderson had his bird dogs. The function of a bird dog to a large extent is implied by the name itself. He precedes the agent into the field, searches for information on prospects, and holds their interests at bay until the principal agent can arrive and consummate the sale. In approaching a prospect, Anderson instructed Frank Kreidler, his number one bird dog:
The motto was to be to get there "Firstus with the Mostus." To this end Anderson obtained the cooperation of E. E. Bodge, then a prominent member of the Honolulu business community. Bodge signed and sent a letter which he and Anderson had prepared for prospects on Maui. The one received by Knox, dated August 2, 1952, read as follows:
The first contact was made by Kreidler. He called on Knox and asked if he had read Bodge's letter. Knox said he had but was attempting to decrease the size of his insurance expenditures. Kreidler then threw out the bait, and in substance this was the conversational action and reaction:
The answer was bank financed insurance.
Knox at this time held seven insurance policies on himself and his family with a total coverage of $36,000. When Kreidler returned to Honolulu from Maui he had Knox's preliminary applications for $50,000, $75,000 and $100,000 of additional coverage. Knox had not been asked what his tax bracket was because he confessed confusion about taxation, but the applications contained information on salary, age, and present insurance policies. Evaluating these facts, Kreidler offered the opinion to Anderson that $100,000 was too much insurance for Knox. The reply was that he, Anderson, would determine how much insurance was enough.
As part of what he called his modus operandi Anderson demanded four prerequisites of clients before he would render his service. Knox was to be medically examined to determine insurability; he would put his old insurance policies in the hands of Anderson to be analyzed for their collateral value; Ellen Knox would be present with her husband at all meetings with Anderson; and the schedule which Anderson would draw up explaining the operation of the insurance plan in Knox's case was not to be shown to any other insurance agent. When these conditions were agreed to, Anderson wrote Knox that he would come to Maui and would "personally present the program and show you exactly how it will work in your case."
Anderson arrived at the plantation house to find a warm greeting from the Knoxes. Bodge's letter had made an impression. The Knoxes knew of Bodge and looked upon him as being one of the "big" men of Hawaii. They were frankly flattered to have been singled out for this visit by a man to whom Bodge had referred as an annuity and insurance counselor of the New York Life Company. Kreidler had called Anderson the greatest man in the insurance field. Anderson was somewhat embarrassed by the build-up which had preceded him. "I may not be the greatest," he protested, then conceded with a modest laugh "but perhaps there are none greater."
To prove this latter point Anderson offered his credentials, testimonials written by Mainland clients. One such letter lauded Anderson's "new approach" to insurance coverage. A businessman had written from Idaho, The Executive Vice President of a refining company stated, "In short you have created a plan and helped work the plan for me."
In matters of personal finances Knox had always found it more convenient to supply an accountant friend with income information and have his tax forms filled in for him each year. His business was growing sugar and to him an income bracket held no more interest or significance than did some of the more complex aspects of the tax law. His insurance matters likewise had been tended to by others. On a rural island community like Maui it is not considered naive if one places trust in the advice of a neighbor insurance man as to how much coverage one should carry....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Anderson v. Knox
...this appeal is taken. The trial judge's opinion in the case, which was tried without jury, is reported under the title of Knox v. Anderson, D.C., 159 F.Supp. 795. The Judge's formal findings are also reported at 162 F.Supp. 338. For the purpose of keeping the length of this present opinion ......
-
Anderson v. Knox
...judgment of the trial court, entered April 18, 1958, preceded the date of the claimed payment. See the trial court's opinion, D.C., 159 F.Supp. 795, at p. 806. If after judgment some payment was made which should be credited on the judgment, that is a matter to be determined by the trial co......
-
Knox v. Anderson, Civ. No. 1382.
...Quinn, Honolulu, Hawaii, Tannenbaum, Steinberg & Shearer, Bertram Fields, Beverly Hills, Cal., for defendant. April 18, 1958. See also, 159 F.Supp. 795. McLAUGHLIN, Chief This cause came on regularly for trial before the court sitting without a jury, on the 30th day of January, 1957, J. Rus......