State ex rel. Bond v. Langum
Decision Date | 11 January 1917 |
Docket Number | No. 20269[311].,20269[311]. |
Parties | STATE ex rel. BOND v. LANGUM, Sheriff. |
Court | Minnesota Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from District Court, McLeod County; P. W. Morrison, Judge.
Habeas corpus by the State, on relation of Era Bond, against Otto S. Langum, Sheriff. From a judgment discharging relator, respondent appeals. Reversed, with directions.
Syllabus by the Court
An order, discharging relator in a habeas corpus proceeding, is appealable, notwithstanding no stay was obtained in the court below.
To overcome the effect to be given the Governor's warrant in an extradition case, the evidence must clearly and satisfactorily demonstrate that the person therein named was not in the demandant state at or about the time the crime for which he is indicted was committed. The evidence is held not to come up to this measure of proof. Lyndon A. Smith, Atty. Gen., and John M. Rees, Co. Atty., of Minneapolis, for appellant.
C. J. Cahaley and Cary & Phelps, both of Minneapolis, for respondent.
The Governor of Illinois issued a requisition to the Governor of this state for Era Bond, the relator, who had been indicted by the grand jury of Cook county, Ill., for the crime of grand larceny charged to have been committed in said county on or about November 7, 1915. After a hearing, the Governor of this state issued his warrant of rendition, directing the respondent, the sheriff of Hennepin county, to apprehend relator and surrender him to the official agent of the state of Illinois as provided by law. The respondent took relator into custody by virtue of the warrant, but, by resort to the writ of habeas corpus in the state and federal courts, relator has thus far prevented extradition. The last writ petitioned for was issued by Judge Morrison, judge of the judicial district adjoining that wherein relator was detained by respondent. Upon the hearing relator was discharged, and the sheriff appealed to this court, where the matter has been heard de novo upon the testimony adduced before Judge Morrison and upon additional testimony taken and reported to this court by a duly appointed referee.
[1] Relator's motion to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that, since no stay was obtained from Judge Morrison, there is nothing before the court, relator is not in custody, and cannot be again apprehended must be denied. The statute (sections 8311 and 8312, G. S. 1913) gives the right of any party aggrieved to appeal from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding in the same manner as other appeals are taken from the district court; and the appeal is to be heard and judgment rendered in this court the same as if, the writ had originally issued here. If the judgment on appeal is contrary to the judgment below, the latter is necessarily reversed and set aside. It cannot be that the court below can render the right of appeal nugatory by omitting or refusing to grant a stay pending the appeal. That relator has been wrongfully discharged from the custody of respondent does not prevent the latter from again apprehending him under the warrant already in his hands....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Petition of Blades, 6661
......(I. C. A., sec. 11-103.). . . 3. Generally, the state itself may appeal from a judgment. discharging a petitioner from custody ...72, 39 So. 55; State v. Davis,. 156 Ala. 181, 47 So. 182; State ex rel. Attorney General. v. Livingston, 170 Ala. 147, 54 So. 109; State v. ... ex rel. Berry v. Merrill, 83 Minn. 252, 86 N.W. 89;. State ex rel. Bond v. Langum, 135 Minn. 320, 160. N.W. 858; Miller v. Gordon, 93 Kan. 382, ......
-
Macomber v. Alexander
...... judgment by virtue of which he held the plaintiff in custody in the state penitentiary. The plaintiff filed an amended traverse against which a .... In Eagles v. United States ex rel. Samuels, 329 U.S. 304, 67 S.Ct. 313, 316, 91 L.Ed. 308, the Circuit Court ...474, 39 N.Y.S.2d 526); State ex rel. Bond v. Langum, 135 Minn. 320, 160 N.W. 858; State v. Towery, 143 Ala. 48, 39 ......
-
Eagles v. United States Samuels
......EAGLES, Post Commanding Officer, Fort Dix, N.J.,. v. UNITED STATES ex rel. SAMUELS. No. 59. Argued Nov. 21, 1946. . Decided Dec. 23, 1946. . Page ...635; James v. Amrine, 157 Kan. 397, 140 P.2d 362; State ex rel. Bond v. Langum, 135 Minn. 320, 160 N.W. 858. . ......
-
State ex rel. Gegenfurtner v. Granquist
......Bates, 101 Minn. 303, 112 N.W. 260; Drew v. Thaw, 235 U.S. 432, 35 S.Ct. 137, 59 L.Ed. 302; Annotation, 93 A.L.R.2d 912. 4 See, State ex rel. Bond v. Langum, 135 Minn. 320, 160 N.W. 858; State ex rel. Liimatainen v. Boekenoogen, 140 Minn. 120, 167 N.W. 301; State ex rel. Stephenson v. Ryan, 235 ......