Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Food & Drug Admin., s. 97-1604

Decision Date10 November 1998
Docket Number97-1581,97-1614 and 97-1605,971606,Nos. 97-1604,s. 97-1604
Citation161 F.3d 764
PartiesBROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION; Lorillard Tobacco Company; Philip Morris, Incorporated; RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company, Plaintiffs--Appellants, and Coyne Beahm, Incorporated; Liggett Group, Incorporated, v. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION; David A. Kessler, M.D., Commissioner of Food and Drugs, Defendants--Appellees. Attorneys General of the State of Minnesota; State of Alaska; of Arizona; State of Arkansas; State of Colorado; State of Connecticut; State of Florida; State of Hawaii; State of Illinois; State of Indiana; State of Iowa; State of Louisiana; State of Kansas; State of Maine; State of Maryland; State of Massachusetts; State of Michigan; State of Mississippi; State of Missouri; State of Montana; State of Nevada; State of New Hampshire; State of New Jersey; State of New Mexico; State of New York; State of North Dakota; State of Ohio; State of Oklahoma; State of Oregon; State of Pennsylvania; State of Rhode Island; State of South Dakota; State Of Texas; State of Utah; State of Vermont; State of Washington; State of West Virginia; State of Wisconsin; The City and County of San Francisco; Public Citizen; The American Academy of Pediatrics; American Cancer Society; American College Preventive Medicine; American Heart Association; American Lung Association; American Medical Association; American Medical Women's Association; American Public Health Association; American Society of Addiction Medicine; The HMO Group; National Association of Elementary School Principals; National Association of Secondary School Principals; National Center for Tobacco-Free Kids; State of Kentucky; Washington Legal Foundation ("WLF"); Mario Andretti; Don Garlits; Al Unser; Rusty Wallace; Cale Yarborough; Richard Burr, Cass Ballenger, Howard Coble, United States Representatives, Lauchcloth, United States Senator, Amici Curiae. COYNE BEAHM, INCORPORATED; Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation; Philip Morris, Incorporated; RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company; National Association of Convenience St
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
3 books & journal articles
  • Sssmokinnn': the Supreme Court Burns the Fda's Authority to Regulate Tobacco in Fda v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp
    • United States
    • University of Nebraska - Lincoln Nebraska Law Review No. 34, 2022
    • Invalid date
    ...72. Id. at 1398. 73. Id. 74. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. FDA, 153 F.3d 155, 160 (4th Cir.), reh'g and reh'g en banc denied, 161 F.3d 764 (4th Cir. 1998), and cert. granted, FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 526 U.S. 1086 (1999), and aff'd, 529 U.S. 120 (2000). 75. Brown & Wil......
  • Sssmokinnn': the Supreme Court Burns the Fda's Authority to Regulate Tobacco in Fda v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp
    • United States
    • Creighton University Creighton Law Review No. 34, 2000
    • Invalid date
    ...72. Id. at 1398. 73. Id. 74. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. FDA, 153 F.3d 155, 160 (4th Cir.), reh'g and reh'g en banc denied, 161 F.3d 764 (4th Cir. 1998), and cert. granted, FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 526 U.S. 1086 (1999), and aff'd, 529 U.S. 120 (2000). 75. Brown & Wil......
  • Current Decisions.
    • United States
    • Defense Counsel Journal Vol. 66 No. 3, July 1999
    • 1 Julio 1999
    ...Children and Adolescents." Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Food and Drug Administration, 153 F.3d 155 (1998), rehearing denied, 161 F.3d 764 (4th Cir. 1998), cert. granted, 119 S.Ct. 1495 The proposed regulations restricted the sale and distribution of cigarettes and smokeless tobac......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT