164 F.3d 630 (9th Cir. 1998), 97-55629, Kaplan v. U.S.

Docket Nº:97-55629. D.C. No. CV-96-00159-RT.
Citation:164 F.3d 630
Party Name:Raymond KAPLAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in its corporate capacity; Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as receiver for Independence Bank; Alan E. Robbins; Marina East Holding Partnership, a California limited partnership; Warren Breslow, individually and as Trustee of the Warren L.
Case Date:October 14, 1998
Court:United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
 
FREE EXCERPT

Page 630

164 F.3d 630 (9th Cir. 1998)

Raymond KAPLAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES of America; Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in its corporate capacity; Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as receiver for Independence Bank; Alan E. Robbins; Marina East Holding Partnership, a California limited partnership; Warren Breslow, individually and as Trustee of the Warren L. Breslow Trust; Jona Goldrich, individually and as Trustee of the Goldrich No. 1 Trust; Jerome H. Snyder; Sol Kest, individually and as Trustee of the Kest Trust No. 1; Milton I. Swimmer; Channel Gateway, L.P., a California limited partnership; Snyder Marina Enterprises, a California limited partnership, Defendants-Appellees,

No. 97-55629. D.C. No. CV-96-00159-RT.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

October 14, 1998

Submitted October 8, 1998 2

Editorial Note:

This opinion appears in the Federal reporter in a table titled "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions". (See FI CTA9 Rule 36-3 regarding use of unpublished opinions)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Robert J. Timlin, District Judge, Presiding.

Before PREGERSON, D.W. NELSON and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM 1

After thoroughly reviewing the record and the briefs of the parties, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

AFFIRMED.


Notes:

[2] The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without oral argument pursuant to 9th Cir. R. 34-4 and Fed. R.App...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP