U.S. v. Kwi Ye Estes, 98-15632
Citation | 166 F.3d 1218 |
Decision Date | 17 December 1998 |
Docket Number | CR-93-00225-ACK,Nos. CV-97-00606-AC,No. 98-15632,98-15632,s. CV-97-00606-AC |
Parties | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joanne KWI YE ESTES, Defendant-Appellant. D.C. |
Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit) |
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii, Alan C. Kay, District Judge, Presiding.
Before BROWNING, TROTT, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
Joanne Kwi Ye Estes, a Hawaii state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging her guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute crystal methamphetamine. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo, see United States v. McMullen, 98 F.3d 1155, 1156-57 (9th Cir.1996), and we affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand.
With respect to her claim that she is entitled to a minor-role adjustment to her sentence, we conclude that Estes has waived this argument by not raising it at her sentencing hearing or on appeal. See McMullen, 98 F.3d at 1157. With respect to her claim that she is entitled to an additional adjustment for acceptance of responsibility, we reject her contention. See United States v. McClain, 30 F.3d 1172, 1174 (9th Cir.1994) (per curiam) ( ).
With respect to Estes' claim that she received ineffective assistance of counsel when her attorney failed to argue for a sentencing adjustment for a minor role in the crime and failed to file a notice of appeal, we decline to reach these issues because they were not raised below. See United States v. Reyes-Alvarado, 963 F.2d 1184, 1189 (9th Cir.1992). 2
Finally, Estes contends that she received ineffective assistance of counsel based on her attorneys' alleged failure to communicate her desire to plead guilty to prosecutors in a timely fashion. We conclude that the statements in Estes' reply to the government's response to her § 2255 motion concerning her counsel's failure to communicate her willingness to plead guilty were sufficient to raise a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. See United States v. Young, 936 F.2d 1050, 1052 (9th Cir.1991) (per curiam)(pro se litigant's pleadings should be liberally construed). Accordingly, we remand so that the district court may conduct an evidentiary hearing on this issue.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial- United States v. Allison
-
United States v. Allison
... ... California. Signed February 24, 2022 Filed February 25, 2022 587 F.Supp.3d 1017 Boris Kukso, US Department of Justice, Tax Division, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. James Franklin Drake, III, ... ...
- Young v. General Services Admin.
-
Hasse v. Rainsdon (In re Pringle)
...(In re Noblit), 72 F.3d 757 (9th Cir.1995) and Trujillo v. Grimmett (In re Trujillo), 215 B.R. 200 (9th Cir. BAP 1997)aff'd,166 F.3d 1218 (9th Cir.1999) (table) had rejected the argument, and that he was bound to follow both. In expanding on the argument, the court noted that Hasse's argume......
-
Foreign Tax Credit Regulations: Nexus As The New Credo
...4 Treas. Reg. '1.901-2(b)(4)(i). 5 T.D. 9959. 6 Treas. Reg. '1.901-2(b)(5)(i)(A). 7 T.C. Memo 1997-134, aff'd without pub. op., 166 F3d 1218 (9th Cir. 8 Treas. Reg. '1.901-2(b)(5)(i)(B). 9 Treas. Reg. '1.901-2(b)(5)(i)(C). 10 Treas. Reg. '1.901-2(b)(5)(ii). To view the full article click he......
-
Table of Cases
...1987), § 1106.6 Mackay v. Apfel , No. Civ.A. 97-c-1548-n, 1999 WL 1335578 at *5 (M.D. Ala. Dec. 9, 1999), § 1317.1 MacKenzie v. Apfel , 166 F.3d 1218, ----, 1998 WL 894568, at *3 (9th Cir .1998), 8th-10 Mackey v. Barnhart, 306 F. Supp.2d 337, 344 (E.D.N.Y. 2004), § 1203.14 Mackey v. Shalala......
-
Table of cases
...1987), § 1106.6 Mackay v. Apfel , No. Civ.A. 97-c-1548-n, 1999 WL 1335578 at *5 (M.D. Ala. Dec. 9, 1999), § 1317.1 MacKenzie v. Apfel , 166 F.3d 1218, ----, 1998 WL 894568, at *3 (9th Cir .1998), 8th-10 Mackey v. Barnhart, 306 F. Supp.2d 337, 344 (E.D.N.Y. 2004), § 1203.14 Mackey v. Shalala......