Countryman v. Fonda, J.&G.R. Co.
Decision Date | 12 March 1901 |
Citation | 166 N.Y. 201,59 N.E. 822 |
Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
Parties | COUNTRYMAN v. FONDA, J. & G. R. CO. |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from supreme court, appellate division, Third department.
Action by Pearl Countryman, as administrator of the estate of Christina Countryman, deceased, against the Fonda, Johnstown & Gloversville Railroad Company. From an order granting a motion for nonsuit, affirmed by the appellate division (54 N. Y. Supp. 1098), plaintiff appeals. Reversed.
Clark L. Jordan, for appellant.
A. D. L. Barker, for respondent.
This is an action by an administrator to recover damages for causing the death of his intestate, resulting from the alleged negligence of the defendant, brought under the provisions of Code Civ. Proc. §§ 1902-1908. On the morning of the 3d day of January, 1895, Christina Countryman, the deceased, was riding in a cutter with one Walter C. Coates, traveling in a southerly direction on Main street, in the city of Gloversville. The defendant operated on that street, in the center thereof, a singletrack electric railroad, there being sufficient space between the track and the curbstones on either side for the passage of vehicles. On the day in question there was a considerable body of snow, which had been cleared from the track of the defendantby depositing it to some extent upon the driveways on either hand. The day was cold, and the deceased was bundled up in a shawl and cloak. Mr. Coates, who was about 38 years of age, was driving his own horse, and his immediate errand was to take the deceased several miles into the country to the house of a friend. They were driving on the track of the defendant at a rate of speed that Coates testified was from 8 to 10 miles an hour. It appears that the cars passed over this route about once every half hour, except that in wintry weather they were not so frequent. When a little south of Second avenue, which crosses Main street at right angles, Coates heard some one shout, ‘Get off the track; the car is coming!’ He states that up to that moment he had not heard the bell ring, and did not know the car was approaching. An eyewitness testifies that the car was about 75 feet from the cutter at the time this warning was given. There is a conflict in the evidence as to the speed of the car. One witness puts it as high as 20 miles an hour, but it may be fairly inferred from the testimony of plaintiff's witnesses that it was 12 miles an hour. After Coates had been thus warned, what occurred may be given in his own language: This witness was asked, on cross-examination, if he had been going at a moderate gait, whether he could have turned out, and he stated that if the horse had been on a slow walk, and he had gotten up on the edge of the cutter, it would not have tipped over. Coates further testified, in substance, that he did not think the car struck the cutter, but that Mrs. Countryman fell out on the side towards the car when they tipped over, and the step or the snow scraper on the rear end of the car struck her in the head as she was lying upon the ground. I appears that after the accident deceased was at once carried into the office of a physician near by, and it was ascertained that she was suffering from three fractures of the skull. She never regained consciousness, and died a few hours later. Dr. Furbeck, who witnessed the accident, testified that the car passed on beyond the point where the intestate was injured some 150 or 200 feet before it was stopped. The testimony of this witness does not vary materially as to the accident from Coates' account of it. Harvey E. Cromwell was also a witness to the accident, and testified that the car was going from 10 to 15 miles an hour, and stated that, according to his very best judgment, it was moving at the rate of 12 miles an hour. He placed the speed of the horse at from 8 to 10 miles an hour. He testified as follows (referring to Mr. Coates): On cross-examination, the witness said: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Gilkeson v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
...the following authorities: Behen v. Railroad, 186 Mo. 430, 85 S.W. 346; Meekin v. Railroad, 164 N.Y. 145, 58 N.E. 50; Countryman v. Railroad, 166 N.Y. 201, 59 N.E. 822; Cooper v. Shore Electric Co., 63 N.J.L. 558, 44 633; Pitkin v. Railroad, 87 N.Y.S. 906; Crapo v. City of Syracuse, 98 A.D.......
-
Gilkeson v. Missouri Pac. Ry. Co.
...W. 346; Meekin v. Brooklyn Heights R. Co., 164 N. Y. 145, 58 N. E. 50, 51 L. R. A. 235, 79 Am. St. Rep. 635; Countryman v. Railroad, 166 N. Y. 201, 59 N. E. 822, 82 Am. St. Rep. 640; Cooper v. Shore Electric Co., 63 N. J. Law, 558, 44 Atl. 633; Pitkin v. Railroad, 94 App. Div. 31, 87 N. Y. ......
-
Lamarca v. U.S., CV-96-2266 (ETB).
...in a reasonable way, those prospective and indefinite damages arising from the death of [the decedent]." Countryman v. Fonda, J & G.R. Co., 166 N.Y. 201, 209-10, 59 N.E. 822, 824 (1901). The customary rule in wrongful death is that "evidence of a decedent's gross income at the time of death......
-
Gonzalez v. New York City Housing Authority
...children sustained pecuniary injuries from their mother's death was a question for the jury]; Countryman v. Fonda, Johnstown & Gloversville R.R. Co., 166 N.Y. 201, 209-210, 59 N.E. 822 [whether 25-year-old son and 22-year-old daughter sustained pecuniary injuries from mother's death was a j......