People v. Farmer, Docket No. 5699

Citation167 N.W.2d 597,16 Mich.App. 148
Decision Date25 February 1969
Docket NumberNo. 1,Docket No. 5699,1
PartiesPEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Herbert FARMER, Defendant-Appellant
CourtCourt of Appeal of Michigan (US)

Alan A. May, Detroit, for defendant-appellant.

Frank J. Kelley, Atty. Gen., Robert A. Derengoski, Sol. Gen., Lansing, William L. Cahalan, Pros. Atty., Samuel J. Torina, Chief Appellate Lawyer, Thomas P. Smith, Asst. Pros. Atty. Wayne County, Detroit, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before FITZGERALD, P.J., and BRONSON and R. B. BURNS, JJ.

R. B. BURNS, Judge.

Defendant was arrested January 12, 1967, and was arraigned before the recorder's court of the city of Detroit, January 14, 1967. On April 6, 1967, an information was filed and the defendant was arraigned on the information.

Defendant was sentenced to 25 to 50 years on a different charge April 26, 1967, and remanded to the department of corrections. A notation of that sentence appears on the mittimus in default of bail of the instant case.

A notice was sent to defense counsel on January 23, 1968, informing him that trial would be held on February 23, 1968. Defendant moved to dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction because 303 days had expired since he was sentenced on April 26, 1967.

M.C.L.A. § 780.131 (Stat.Ann.1969 Cum.Supp. § 28.969(1)) provides:

'Whenever the department of corrections shall receive notice that there is pending in this state any untried warrant, indictment, information or complaint setting forth against any inmate of a penal institution of this state a criminal offense for which a prison sentence might be imposed upon conviction, such inmate shall be brought to trial within 180 days after the department of corrections shall cause to be delivered to the prosecuting attorney of the county in which such warrant, indictment, information or complaint is pending written notice of the place of inprisonment of such inmate and a request for final disposition of such warrant, indictment, information or complaint. The request shall be accompanied by a statement setting forth the term of commitment under which the prisoner is being held, the time already served, the time remaining to be served on the sentence, the amount of good time earned, the time of aprole eligibility of the prisoner and any decisions of the parole board relating to the prisoner. The written notice and statement provided herein shall be delivered by certified mail.'

M.C.L.A. § 780.133 (Stat.Ann.1969 Cum.Supp. § 28.969(3)) provides:

'In the event that, within the time limitation set forth in section 1 of this act (§ 780.131), action is not commenced on the matter for which request for disposition was made, no court of this state shall any longer have jurisdiction thereof, nor shall the untried warrant, indictment, information or complaint be of any further force or effect, and the court shall enter an order dismissing the same with...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • People v. Ferguson
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • 5 Diciembre 1979
    ...good faith action to meet the demands of People v. Hill. Cf., People v. Wright, supra, 252-253, 280 N.W.2d 836; People v. Farmer, 16 Mich.App. 148, 151, 167 N.W.2d 597 (1969). Defendants next attack the search warrant used to gain entry into and to search the apartment in which they were ar......
  • People v. Forrest, Docket No. 27207
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • 9 Noviembre 1976
    ...mandated dismissal of pending charges where delays result from protracted periods of prosecutorial inaction. See People v. Farmer, 16 Mich.App. 148, 167 N.W.2d 597 (1969) (272 days). Even where defendant has failed to raise the issue below, this Court has reversed a conviction where the pro......
  • People v. Ferrazza
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • 26 Agosto 1969
    ...370 Mich. 147, 153, 121 N.W.2d 438; People v. Williams (1968), 9 Mich.App. 676, 682, 683, 687, 158 N.W.2d 42; People v. Farmer (1969), 16 Mich.App. 148, 167 N.W.2d 597, construing a different statute 9 but on principle relevant in the application of M.C.L.A. § 767.38 as Defendant Whitney ha......
  • People v. Downing, Docket Nos. 9399
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • 19 Febrero 1971
    ...Ballard's period of incarceration during which an untried warrant was outstanding consisted of 279 days. In People v. Farmer (1969), 16 Mich.App. 148, 151, 167 N.W.2d 597, 598, a claim was asserted under the 180-day rule and the Court of Appeals reversed the conviction, 'In the present case......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT