Complitano v. Steel & Alloy Tank Co.
| Decision Date | 20 March 1961 |
| Docket Number | No. A--94,A--94 |
| Citation | 34 N.J. 300,168 A.2d 809 |
| Parties | Dominick COMPLITANO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STEEL & ALLOY TANK, CO., Respondent-Respondent. |
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
Louis C. Jacobson, Newark, for appellant.
Isidor Kalisch, Newark, for respondent.
The judgment is reversed for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Conford in the Appellate Division.
HALL and HANEMAN, JJ., vote to affirm the judgment for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Foley.
For reversal: Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR and SCHETTINO--5.
For affirmance: Justices HALL and HANEMAN--2.
To continue reading
Request your trial
24 cases
-
Ricciardi v. Damar Products Co.
... ... park to the excursion boat); and, the more recent case of Complitano v. Steel & Alloy Tank Co., 63 N.J.Super. 444, 164 A.2d 792 (App.Div.1960), ... ...
-
Mikkelsen v. N. L. Industries
... ... See Complitano v. Steel & Alloy Tank Co., 63 N.J.Super. 444, 469, 164 A.2d 792 ... ...
-
Ricciardi v. Damar Products Co.
...(App.Div.1950),Id., 23 N.J.Super. 88, 92 A.2d 506 (App.Div.1952). The controlling doctrine is expounded in Complitano v. Steel & Alloy Tank Co., 34 N.J. 300, 168 A.2d 809 (1961), reversing the judgment of the Appellate Division upon the dissenting opinion therein of Judge Conford, 63 N.J.Su......
-
Strzelecki v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.
...the recreational activity bespoke its relation to the employment. 28 N.J. at 586, 593--594, 147 A.2d 783. In Complitano v. Steel & Alloy Tank Co., 34 N.J. 300, 168 A.2d 809 (1961), compensation was allowed though the injury occurred during a softball game conducted after working hours away ......
Request a trial to view additional results