Federal Deposit Ins. Corporation v. Alker

Citation169 F.2d 336
Decision Date29 July 1948
Docket NumberNo. 8805.,8805.
PartiesFEDERAL DEPOSIT INS. CORPORATION v. ALKER et al.
CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)

Allen S. Olmsted, 2d, of Philadelphia, Pa., for Federal Deposit Ins. Corporation.

Harry J. Alker, of Philadelphia, Pa., for Alker and others.

Before BIGGS, McLAUGHLIN and O'CONNELL, Circuit Judges.

BIGGS, Circuit Judge.

The appellants have again petitioned this court for rehearing and for a stay in the handing down of the mandate. They state that a prior oral application, which was restricted to a request for a stay in the handing down of the mandate, was based not only on pending legislation designed to overrule retroactively the effect of the decision of the Supreme Court in D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp., 315 U.S. 447, 62 S.Ct. 676, 86 L.Ed. 956, but was bottomed also on an express intention to file a second petition for rehearing to the Supreme Court.

The oral application made to this court, as indicated in the preceding paragraph, was based solely on the expressed intention of the appellants to secure the passage of legislation by Congress which would overrule retroactively the effect of the Supreme Court's decision in D'Oench, Duhme. Counsel for the appellants did not state to this court that the appellants intended to file a second petition for rehearing to the Supreme Court. In fact counsel for the appellants stated to this court that they did not intend to file another petition for rehearing either to the Supreme Court or to this court.

This interminable litigation must be brought to an end. No useful purpose can be served pursuing it further. We recount the steps. The appellants lost their case in the court below which filed no opinion for publication. We affirmed that decision. 3 Cir., 151 F.2d 907. The appellants then applied for certiorari which was denied. 327 U.S. 799, 66 S.Ct. 901, 90 L.Ed. 1025. Rehearing was denied. 328 U.S. 877, 66 S. Ct. 976, 90 L.Ed. 1645. A second petition for rehearing was denied. 328 U.S. 879, 66 S.Ct. 1117, 90 L.Ed. 1647. Motion for leave to file a third petition for rehearing was denied. 328 U.S. 881, 66 S.Ct. 1361, 90 L.Ed. 1648. A motion for leave to file a fourth petition for rehearing was denied. 329 U.S. 823, 67 S.Ct. 28, 91 L.Ed. 699. A motion for leave to file a fifth petition for rehearing was denied. 329 U.S. 830, 67 S.Ct. 350, 91 L.Ed. 704. A petition in the nature of a bill of review, seeking to obtain from this court leave to apply to the court below for a new trial, was denied by this court. 3 cir., 163 F.2d 123. Rehearing was denied. 3 Cir., 164 F.2d 469. Certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court May 24, 1948, 68 S.Ct. 1337. Rehearing was denied June 21, 1948, 68 S.Ct. 1527.

This court cannot take the position when a judgment has been rendered unfavorable to one of the parties to a litigation that it will not hand down its mandate to permit the losing party to procure legislation which would overcome...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Butcher & Sherrerd v. Welsh
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • August 5, 1953
    ...then once again petitioned this Court for rehearing, and for a stay in the handing-down of our mandate. This petition was denied, 3 Cir., 1948, 169 F.2d 336. Pursuant to denial of certiorari by the Supreme Court, 336 U.S. 953, 69 S.Ct. 880, 93 L.Ed. 1108, the mandate denying leave to the Di......
  • Moore v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)
    • November 1, 1948
    ...that our decision of the instant case be postponed until the next Congress acts upon the suggested amendment. Federal Deposit Ins. Corporation v. Alker, 3 Cir., 169 F.2d 336. Finally, petitioner complains because the Tax Court recognized the transfer of an interest in the same partnership m......
  • Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Alker
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • May 29, 1956
    ...of mandamus the appeal of the use-plaintiffs from the order in question will be dismissed. 1 See 151 F.2d 907; 163 F.2d 123; 164 F.2d 469; 169 F.2d 336; Secretary of Banking of Pa. v. Alker, 3 Cir., 183 F. 2d 429; Butcher & Sherrerd v. Welsh, 3 Cir., 206 F.2d 259, and Federal Deposit Ins. C......
  • Secretary of Banking of Pennsylvania v. Alker
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • July 25, 1950
    ...L. Ed. 1782; 335 U.S. 838, 69 S.Ct. 14, 93 L.Ed. 390; 335 U.S. 864, 69 S.Ct. 123, 93 L.Ed. 409; 335 U.S. 894, 69 S.Ct. 242, 93 L.Ed. 431; 169 F.2d 336, certiorari denied 336 U.S. 953, 69 S.Ct. 880, 93 L. Ed. ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT