Leiva-Montalvo v. I.N.S., LEIVA-MONTALV

Citation173 F.3d 749
Decision Date22 April 1999
Docket NumberNo. 97-71414,LEIVA-MONTALV,P,97-71414
Parties99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2912 Rafael Santosetitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)

William R. Gardner and Miguel D. Gadda, San Francisco, California, for the petitioner.

Frank W. Hunger, Richard M. Evans and John L. Davis, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. I & NS No. A73 754 865.

Before: KRAVITCH, 1 REINHARDT, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge:

Rafael Santos Leiva-Montalvo ("Leiva-Montalvo"), a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions this court for review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") dismissing his appeal of the Immigration Judge ("IJ")'s denial of his application for asylum and withholding of deportation. We grant the petition for review.

We must uphold the BIA's determination that an alien is not eligible for asylum or entitled to withholding of deportation if it is "supported by reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence" in the record. INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481, 112 S.Ct. 812, 815, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992); Ramos-Vasquez v. INS, 57 F.3d 857, 861 (9th Cir.1995). If neither the BIA nor the IJ makes an explicit finding that a petitioner's testimony is not credible, we are required to accept the testimony as true. See Hartooni v. INS, 21 F.3d 336, 342-43 (9th Cir.1994); Canjura-Flores- "Flores v. INS, 784 F.2d 885, 888-89 (9th Cir.1985). 2

In this case, neither the BIA nor the IJ made an adverse credibility finding, so we must assume that Leiva-Montalvo testified truthfully. According to Leiva-Montalvo, between 1990 and 1995 a group he calls the "Recontras" first tried to persuade him to join them, then threatened his life, and finally detained him, shot at him, and abducted (and perhaps later killed) two of his friends. The Recontras, according to Leiva-Montalvo, are former guerillas who, despite El Salvador's 1992 Peace Accords, continue to attempt to advance their ideals through force. The BIA agreed with the IJ's conclusion that the Recontras had not persecuted Leiva-Montalvo because of his actual or imputed political views. Instead, the BIA found, the Recontras were probably a criminal gang motivated by a desire for monetary gain. The BIA therefore held that because Leiva-Montalvo had not shown that his persecutors had acted on account of his political opinion or on the basis of any other ground protected by the immigration statutes, such as his race or religion, he was not eligible for asylum or entitled to withholding of deportation.

Assuming, as we must, that events occurred as Leiva-Montalvo related them, we conclude that substantial evidence does not support the BIA's determination that he did not suffer persecution on account of his political views. According to Leiva-Montalvo, the Recontras were interested in him because of his older brothers' previous affiliation with El Salvador's guerillas. All of Leiva-Montalvo's discussions with the Recontras centered on politics and ideology; there was no evidence indicating that their motivations were purely criminal. Although Leiva-Montalvo agreed at one point that the Recontras were "criminals," 3 he clearly used this word to mean that the Recontras were acting outside the law, not that their sole objective was mercenary gain. Because Leiva-Montalvo showed that the Recontras harassed, detained, threatened, and shot at him on account of his actual or imputed political views, he has established that he was persecuted in the past.

An alien who establishes past persecution is entitled to a

presumption that [he] has a well-founded fear of future persecution.... To rebut this presumption, the INS must show by a preponderance of the evidence that, "since the time the persecution occurred conditions in the applicant's country of nationality ... have changed to such an extent that the applicant no longer has a well-founded fear of being persecuted were he to return."

Singh v. INS, 94 F.3d 1353, 1360-61 (9th Cir.1996) (quoting 8 C.F.R. § 208.13(b)(1)(i)); see also Pitcherskaia v. INS, 118 F.3d 641, 646 (9th Cir.1997); Prasad v. INS, 101 F.3d 614, 617 (9th Cir.1996). The INS has not met this burden. Although it introduced into evidence a State Department report describing improvements in El Salvador's human rights record following the 1992 Peace Accords, 4 neither this document nor any other evidence in the record shows that conditions in El Salvador changed significantly between early 1995, when Leiva-Montalvo was harassed, threatened, and attacked, and the date of his hearing. Because the presumption that Leiva-Montalvo has a well-founded fear of future persecution stands unrebutted, he is statutorily eligible for asylum.

Leiva-Montalvo also has established that he is entitled to withholding of deportation. A petitioner's deportation must be withheld if it is "clear[ly] probab[le]" that he will be persecuted in his home country. Vallecillo-Castillo v. INS, 121 F.3d 1237,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Mamouzian v. Ashcroft
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • December 9, 2004
    ...v. INS, 281 F.3d 1069, 1074-75 (9th Cir.2002); Reyes-Guerrero v. INS, 192 F.3d 1241, 1245-46 (9th Cir.1999); Leiva-Montalvo v. INS, 173 F.3d 749, 751 (9th Cir.1999). Thus, there is no doubt that Mamouzian has made a sufficient showing of persecution. We hold that any reasonable fact-finder ......
  • Gomez–granillo v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • July 14, 2011
    ...of under 8 U.S.C. § 1186a(c)(4)); Kataria v. INS, 232 F.3d 1107, 1113–14 (9th Cir.2000) (eligibility for asylum); Leiva–Montalvo v. INS, 173 F.3d 749, 750 (9th Cir.1999) (eligibility for asylum and withholding of removal). 8 Indeed, shortly after this case was argued and submitted, another ......
  • Lim v. INS
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • November 4, 1999
    ...the IJ nor the BIA made negative credibility findings, we are "required to accept [Lim's] testimony as true. " Leiva-Montalvo v. INS, 173 F.3d 749, 750 (9th Cir. 1999) (citations A. Sufficiently Raised Issue on Appeal We hold that Lim sufficiently raised issues on appeal, and thus we declin......
  • Himri v. Ashcroft, 03-71152.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • August 2, 2004
    ...Judge. Because the facts were not disputed and were accepted as credible by the IJ, we accept as true here. See Leiva-Montalvo v. INS, 173 F.3d 749, 750 (9th Cir.1999). 2. The first child, who was born in the United States, is an American citizen. The El Himris since have had three other ch......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT