Gibbons v. British & N.A. Steam-nav. Co.
Citation | 55 N.E. 987,175 Mass. 212 |
Parties | GIBBONS v. BRITISH & N. A. STEAM-NAV. CO. |
Decision Date | 13 January 1900 |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts |
T. H. Buttimer, for plaintiff.
L. S. Dabney, for defendant.
This is an action of tort for personal injuries. Workmen who were fitting up the defendant's vessel with sheep pens had placed an unfinished trough near a hatch. The plaintiff, coming up a ladder, when he reached the hatch took hold of the unfinished trough, relying upon its being heavy enough or strongly enough fastened for him to trust his weight to it with safety. He was mistaken. The trough yielded, and he fell. The judge who tried the case directed a verdict for the defendant, and the case is here on exceptions. We regard the ruling as plainly right. The plaintiff relied upon the trough at his own risk. It did not appear to have been put where it was for the purpose of such use as he made of it. If the evidence shows that the plaintiff's ordinary mode of egress was barred, which is doubtful, it does not appear that he could not get out without using the trough as he did; and, even if that had appeared, still he knew that the work was unfinished, and that he was not at liberty to assume that that particular part of it had reached such a stage that he could rely upon it as securely fastened. It was not even necessary for him to use that hatch and ladder, but, if it had been, he could not hold the defendant liable for his accident.
Exceptions overruled.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Gibbons v. British & N.A. Steam-Nav. Co.
...175 Mass. 21255 N.E. 987GIBBONSv.BRITISH & N. A. STEAM-NAV. CO.Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk.Jan. 13, Exceptions from superior court, Suffolk county. Action by one Gibbons against the British & North Atlantic Steam-Navigation Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff......