Ohio & M. Ry. Co. v. Hill

Citation117 Ind. 56,18 N.E. 461
CourtSupreme Court of Indiana
Decision Date10 November 1888
PartiesOhio & M. Ry. Co. v. Hill.

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from circuit court, Clark county; Charles P. Ferguson, Judge.

Action by Matilda Hill, administratrix of the estate of David Hill, deceased, to recover of the Ohio & Mississippi Railway Company for the death of her intestate, resulting from the alleged negligence of defendant in the management of its engine. Judgment was rendered for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

James K. Marsh and Ward H. Watson, for appellant. Burke & Stannard, for appellee.

Zollars, J.

David Hill received injuries in a collision with one of appellant's engines, from which he died. This is an action by the administratrix to recover from the railway company. The grounds upon which appellant's counsel contend that the judgment ought to be reversed are that the complaint is insufficient, that the trial court erred in the giving and refusal of instructions, and that the verdict and judgment are not sustained by sufficient evidence. Upon the view we feel constrained to take of the case, it will not be necessary for us to examine the first two grounds thus urged. The undisputed facts in the case, as shown by the evidence are these: The Ohio & Mississippi Railway and the Jeffersonville, Madison & Indianapolis Railway cross at right angles in the city of Jeffersonville. Parallel with the Ohio & Mississippi Railway is Illinois avenue, a public street. That street, at the time of the injury complained of, and at this time, so far as shown, was and is unworked and untraveled by vehicles. The two railways are connected by a double tracked “T.” The tracks of the “T” were so separated that persons might walk between them. They crossed Illinois avenue diagonally, and upon a grade of some three or four feet above the surface of the balance of the street. It had been customary for years for the Jeffersonville, Madison & Indianapolis Railway Company to bring freight cars over from Louisville on its main track, and throw them in upon the “T,” to be taken up by the Ohio & Mississippi Railway Company, and removed to its main track, and placed in its trains. This was done by means of a switch-engine passing back and forth over the “T.” It had for a long time been customary for that engine to be upon the “T” at different hours in the day, to there avoid and take out the freight cars thus thrown in by the Jeffersonville, Madison & Indianapolis Railway Company, and especially in the evenings. Hill, the decedent, had lived on Illinois avenue for about 13 years, just opposite the point where the “T” tracks crossed the avenue; his house being not more than 25 or 30 feet from the railroad. He had knowledge of the custom of the railway company in the use of the switch-engine upon the “T” tracks in the removal of cars thrown in upon the two tracks. When cars were thus being brought over by the Jeffersonville, Madison & Indianapolis Railway Company, and thrown in upon the “T” tracks, its passenger trains could not go out over the main track. On the evening of the injury to Hill one of its passenger trains had pulled in upon the “T” track furthest from his house, and was there awaiting the throwing in of the freight cars, and the consequent clearing of the main track of obstructions. The train was composed of an engine, a baggage car, and three coaches. It had so far passed over Illinois avenue that the rear end of the rear coach was about opposite to Hill's house. The steam escaping from the engine was making some noise. Some time after 6 o'clock the switch-engine had come upon the “T” track nearest to Hill's house, and had stopped beyond the crossing of the avenue some little distance, and was also awaiting the throwing in of the freight cars. The rear end of the switch-engine was towards the street crossing. Those in charge of the engine, and others, testified that it was lighted up by a head-light. Others testified that they did not see such a light upon the engine either before or at the time of the collision with Hill. For the purposes of this decision, we may assume that this negative and positive testimony makes a conflict in the evidence, and that because of that conflict the evidence should be regarded as showing that the engine was without a headlight. Such were the positions of the train and switch-engine when Hill reached his house in the evening, and when he left it immediately before his collision with the switch-engine, on the 1st day of September. After having had his supper, he left the house, and passed out through his gate, on his way towards the “T” tracks. It was then after night, but the switch-engine could readily be seen from his house and on his way to the “T” tracks. Before reaching those tracks, the Jeffersonville, Madison & Indianapolis Railway Company threw a freight car in upon the “T” track nearest to his house, and, in order to avoid a collision with the moving car, the switch-engine was started and moved across Illinois avenue. Just as it reached that avenue, Hill stepped upon the track, and came in collision with it, and received the injuries from which he died. There is evidence tending very strongly to show that he was not struck by the engine, but by the Jeffersonville, Madison & Indianapolis freight car so thrown in upon the “T,” and which was following close upon the switch-engine. But as there is a conflict in the evidence, and as it seems to be conceded that to justify a recovery by appellee, it should be found that Hill was struck by the switch-engine, we adopt that conclusion as an established fact in the case. Those in charge of that engine, and others, testified positively that when it was started the whistle was sounded, and the bell rung, and that at the time and prior to being started the escaping steam was making quite a noise. Others testified that they...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT