181 F.3d 88 (4th Cir. 1999), 99-1344, Jacobs v. Stoner

Docket Nº:99-1344.
Citation:181 F.3d 88
Party Name:Samuel K. JACOBS; Nancy Heckerman, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Robert E. STONER; Roberta L. Stoner, Defendants-Appellees.
Case Date:June 22, 1999
Court:United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
 
FREE EXCERPT

Page 88

181 F.3d 88 (4th Cir. 1999)

Samuel K. JACOBS; Nancy Heckerman, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

Robert E. STONER; Roberta L. Stoner, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 99-1344.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

June 22, 1999

Editorial Note:

This opinion appears in the Federal reporter in a table titled "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions". (See FI CTA4 Rule 36 regarding use of unpublished opinions)

Submitted June 17, 1999

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-99-46-AW)

Samuel K. Jacobs, Nancy Heckerman, Appellants Pro Se.

Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Samuel K. Jacobs and Nancy Heckerman sought from the district court an equitable lien and specific performance of a contract. The district court dismissed their claim on res judicata grounds and because there was a parallel state court action involving related claims. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Jacobs v. Stoner, No. CA-99-46-AW (D.Md. Feb. 16, 1999). [*] We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP