181 F.3d 91 (4th Cir. 1999), 99-1289, Stoner v. Jacobs

Docket Nº:99-1289.
Citation:181 F.3d 91
Party Name:Robert E. STONER; Roberta L. Stoner, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Samuel JACOBS, a/k/a Samuel Ramachandra, a/k/a S.R.J. Chandra; Nancy Jacobs, a/k/a Nancy Ramachandra, a/k/a Nancy Heckerman, Defendants-Appellants.
Case Date:June 22, 1999
Court:United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
 
FREE EXCERPT

Page 91

181 F.3d 91 (4th Cir. 1999)

Robert E. STONER; Roberta L. Stoner, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

Samuel JACOBS, a/k/a Samuel Ramachandra, a/k/a S.R.J. Chandra; Nancy Jacobs, a/k/a Nancy Ramachandra, a/k/a Nancy Heckerman, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 99-1289.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

June 22, 1999

Editorial Note:

This opinion appears in the Federal reporter in a table titled "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions". (See FI CTA4 Rule 36 regarding use of unpublished opinions)

Submitted June 17, 1999

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-98-4167-AW)

Samuel Jacobs, Nancy Jacobs, Appellants Pro Se.

Damon K. Bernstein, Gill & Sippel, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Samuel Jacobs and Nancy Jacobs seek to appeal the district court's order remanding to state court the civil action in which they are Defendants. Remand orders are generally not reviewable on appeal. [*] See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (1994). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Not...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP