Netherlands Ins. Co. v. Fowler
| Citation | 181 So.2d 692 |
| Decision Date | 12 January 1966 |
| Docket Number | No. 5516,5516 |
| Parties | NETHERLANDS INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Appellant, v. Mary FOWLER, Appellee. |
| Court | Court of Appeal of Florida (US) |
James M. Adams, of Jones, Adams, Paine & Foster, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
William M. Holland, of Holland & Smith, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
This is an appeal by Netherlands Insurance Company, Defendant, from a final judgment ordering payment of the insured value of $10,000 to the insured, Mary Fowler, Plaintiff, under a fire insurance contract. The action was tried before the judge sitting without a jury.
The subject policy provided coverage to the extent of the actual cash value at the time of the loss, but not exceeding the amount it would cost to repair or replace the property with materials of like kind and quality and without any allowance for increased costs of repair or construction by reason of any ordinance or law regulating construction or repair.
The insured building was severely damaged by fire, and the City refused to allow the building to be repaired and ordered it demolished upon the premise that it was unrepairable and dangerous. The insurance company appraised the damage caused by fire at $4,619.69, and tendered this amount. The insured refused to accept the tender and sued for $10,000.00 face amount of the policy. The trial judge found that the insured was entitled to be compensated upon the basis of total destruction of the building.
The insurer contends that the trial court incorrectly applied F.S .A. Sec. 627.0801(1), in that said statute involves 'total loss by fire' and that the building here was only partially destroyed by fire. It further contends that the fire damage was repairable, that the total destruction of the building was caused by operation of city building codes rather than the fire, that the exculpatory clause in the contract excludes liability for losses occasioned by ordinances regulating construction.
The insured contends, on the other hand, that the fire was the cause of the condition of the building which prompted its condemnation by the City, and that under the Valued Policy Law, F.S.A. Sec. 627.0801(1), the insurance company was liable for the face amount of the policy.
The parties have not found nor have we been able to find a ruling directly on this question by the appellate courts of this State. Therefore, we must first determine if the insured has sustained a...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Danzeisen v. Selective Ins. Co. of America
...F.2d 803 (5th Cir.1963); Taylor v. Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co., 232 Ark. 981, 341 S.W.2d 770, 771-72 (1961); Netherlands Ins. Co. v. Fowler, 181 So.2d 692, 693 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1966); Garnett v. Transamerica Ins. Serv., 118 Idaho 769, 800 P.2d 656, 666 (1990); Hertog v. Milwaukee Mut. Ins. Co.,......
-
Florida Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co. v. Cox
...not insignificant part7 as the result of windstorm damage. The Second District reached a similar result in Netherlands Insurance Co. v. Fowler, 181 So.2d 692, 693 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966), where fire only partially destroyed an insured building, but another excluded peril — there the operation of......
-
Greer v. Owners Ins. Co.
...the damage actually prohibit or prevent the building's repair, such that the building has to be demolished. Netherlands Ins. Co. v. Fowler, 181 So.2d 692, 693 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966). In applying the "identity test" to the facts of this case, the undisputed evidence shows that after Hurricane Iv......
-
Mierzwa v. FLORIDA WINDSTORM UNDERWRITING
...the purpose of recovery under an insurance policy. Although Barnes did not involve the valued policy statute, Netherlands Insurance Co. v. Fowler, 181 So.2d 692 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966), is a case where the valued policy law trumped the insurance company's claim that a policy exclusion prevented ......
-
Florida's "valued policy" law: the eye of the storm.
...result in an application of Florida's valued policy law. The following Florida cases are instructive. In Netherlands Ins. Co. v. Fowler, 181 So. 2d 692 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966), the policy provided $10,000 in dwelling coverage to the extent of the actual cash value at the time of loss, but not ex......
-
Florida's "valued policy law": clarifying some recent misconceptions.
...terms are expressed in language that is clear and definite in meaning." (5) Mierzwa, 877 So.2d at 781; Netherlands Ins. Co. v. Fowler, 181 So.2d 692 (Fla. 2d D.C.A. 1966). (6) Id. at (7) Continental Cas. Co. v. Curl, 721 So.2d 431, 433 (Fla. 3d D.C.A. 1998) (quoting BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY 1......