In re Brown's Estate
Citation | 28 Wn.2d 436,183 P.2d 768 |
Decision Date | 17 July 1947 |
Docket Number | 30181. |
Court | United States State Supreme Court of Washington |
Parties | In re BROWN'S ESTATE. v. TURNER. BROWN |
Department 1
Proceeding in the matter of the estate of Louis W. Brown, deceased wherein Florence Turner, who had theretofore been named administratrix, filed her application as surviving spouse for award of property in lieu of homestead. From an order awarding surviving spouse certain items of personal property in lieu of homestead, Edward O. Brown appeals.
Reversed.
Appeal from Superior Court, Benton County; B. B. Horrigan, Judge.
Futter, Merrick & Merrick, of Pasco, for appellant.
Moulton & Powell and Thomas B. Gess, all to Kennewick, for respondent.
When Florence Turner married Louis W. Brown in 1943 both were elderly people. He was in comfortable circumstances, with a small farm, stocks, bonds and cash, while she had no separate property. No community property was accumulated. Early in 1946 the husband brought an action for a divorce. January 31 1946, Mr. and Mrs. Brown, both being represented by attorneys, entered into a written property settlement which recited that the parties had separated and were living apart but that they desired to remain as friendly as possible and believed that they could make an equitable and just property agreement which would properly provide for both parties since they had not been able to make a success of their marriage. The agreement, so far as material, reads as follows:
On February 1, 1946, the day after the property settlement was signed, both parties sold their separate interest in the real estate to John A. Rothfuss and wife. Louis Brown signed a real estate contract and statutory real estate warranty deed and Florence Brown signed a quitclaim deed. The...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bruce v. Dyer
...This is particularly so where, as here, the agreement recites that it shall bind the parties' heirs and assigns. In re Brown's Estate, 28 Wash.2d 436, 183 P.2d 768 (1947). At least two other courts have held that particular separation agreements, which called for the sale of and distributio......
-
Estate of Lindsay, Matter of
...acts of the parties to the instrument." In re Estate of Garrity, 22 Wash.2d 391, 398, 156 P.2d 217 (1945); In re Estate of Brown, 28 Wash.2d 436, 440, 183 P.2d 768 (1947). Cathy contends she is entitled to a homestead allowance since the separation agreement did not specifically waive that ......
-
Petelle v. Ersfeld-Petelle (In re Estate of Petelle)
...by contract or conduct. The most analogous case cited by respondent and relied on by the Court of Appeals is In re Estate of Brown , 28 Wash.2d 436, 440, 183 P.2d 768 (1947). In Brown , we found that the language in a separation contract waived a surviving spouse's statutorily created homes......
-
Pavluvcik v. Sullivan
...v. Butner, 62 N.C.App. 701, 703-705, 303 S.E.2d 399 (1983); Roberts v. Roberts, 381 So.2d 1333 (Miss.1980); In re Brown's Estate, 28 Wash.2d 436, 439-441, 183 P.2d 768 (1947); In re Estate of Nelson, 85 Wash.2d 602, 609-610, 537 P.2d 765 (1975). See also In re Garrity's Estate, 22 Wash.2d 3......