The Rosalie McLoughlin

Citation186 F. 255
PartiesTHE ROSALIE McLOUGHLIN. v. CRESCENT SAND & GRAVEL CO. GUINAN
Decision Date19 January 1911
CourtU.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York

Armstrong Brown & Boland, for Crescent Sand & Gravel Co.

James J. Macklin, for Bridget Guinan.

CHATFIELD District Judge.

The libelant Guinan was the owner of a scow, the Rosalie McLoughlin, which had previously been used for carrying sand from the works of the Crescent Sand & Gravel Company, at Port Washington, Long Island. At that time the scow leaked so that she required trimming and pumping to prevent disaster. She was subsequently caulked and repaired, and used for the carrying of coal.

There is some dispute as to whether she did or did not leak with the cargo of coal, but at any rate, upon the 21st of May 1909, her owner having represented that she had been made seaworthy, she was again chartered to go to Port Washington to bring a cargo of sand to New York, at the rate of $5 a day, the towing, wharfage, loading, and discharging of the scow to be at the expense of the respondent, who also paid the captain for trimming.

Upon her arrival she was placed under what are called the 'bridges,' which in reality are three small slips, with a trestle structure over each slip. A track for the dump cars runs out in the middle of each trestle; the sand thus being dumped over the line of the keel of the vessel, which substantially fills the slip when in position for loading.

The Rosalie McLoughlin was loaded with the amount of sand which the respondent's servants thought should be placed on board, and there is some testimony that her captain thought he could take a load or two more. Some dispute was had as to the question of trimming, and one witness testifies that the vessel was receiving more sand on one side than on the other, and listed until her rail was under water, but that, when some of the claimant's men trimmed the vessel, she gradually listed in the other direction. Soon after she sank, and dumped part of her load of sand in the slip, necessitating the services of wreckers to remove the boat herself, and of a tug to 'kick out' the deposited sand from the slip.

The Crescent Sand & Gravel Company have filed a libel for the loss of sand, the expenses of wreckage and towage, and the necessary work to remove the sand deposited in the slip. The libelant Guinan has filed a cross-libel for the damage to the scow.

The evidence upon the trial shows that the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Wessel Duval & Co. v. Charleston Lighterage & Transfer Co., 929.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of South Carolina
    • March 31, 1928
    ... ... Arundel, etc., Co. v. Naylor & Co. (C. C. A. 4) 242 F. 494; Oregon Round Lumber Co. v. Portland, etc., Co. (D. C.) 162 F. 912; The Rosalie McLoughlin (D. C.) 186 F. 255; The Kathryn B. Guinan (C. C. A.) 176 F. 301; Sanbern v. Wright (D. C.) 171 F. 449, affirmed (C. C. A.) 179 F. 1021; ... ...
  • Bartley v. Borough Development Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • April 13, 1914
    ... ... except leaking from unseaworthiness, then the presumption and ... the conclusions of fact are in accord, as in The Rosalie ... McLoughlin (D.C.) 186 F. 255 ... [214 F. 305] ... In the ... present case the libelant has attempted to rely upon the rule ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT