188 F.2d 362 (3rd Cir. 1951), 10317, Standard Dry Wall Products, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board.

Docket Nº:10317.
Citation:188 F.2d 362
Party Name:STANDARD DRY WALL PRODUCTS, Inc., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.
Case Date:April 25, 1951
Court:United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
 
FREE EXCERPT

Page 362

188 F.2d 362 (3rd Cir. 1951)

STANDARD DRY WALL PRODUCTS, Inc., Petitioner,

v.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.

No. 10317.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

April 25, 1951

         Argued April 3, 1951.

         On petition for review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board.

         Thomas E. Whiteen, Pittsburgh, Pa., for petitioner.

         Robert G. Johnson, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Ruth V. Russell, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board.

         Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and MARRIS and GOODRICH, Circuit Judges.

         PER CURIAM.

         The petitioner, Standard Dry Wall Products, Inc., insists that there is not sufficient evidence on 'the whole record' as that phrase is used in the Administrative Procedure Act, 60 Stat. 237, as amended, 5 U.S.C.A. § 1001 et seq. and the National Labor Relations Act, as amended,

Page 363

61 Stat. 136, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., in the light of the decisions of the Supreme Court in Universal Camera Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, 71 S.Ct. 456, and National Labor Relations Board v. Pittsburgh Steamship Company, 71 S.Ct. 453, to support the Board's findings that the petitioner violated Section 8(a)(1) and (3) of the National Labor...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP