Standard Dry Wall Products v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

Citation188 F.2d 362
Decision Date25 April 1951
Docket NumberNo. 10317.,10317.
PartiesSTANDARD DRY WALL PRODUCTS, Inc., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.
CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)

Thomas E. Whiteen, Pittsburgh, Pa., for petitioner.

Robert G. Johnson, Washington, D. C. (George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Ruth V. Russell, all of Washington, D. C., on the brief), Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and MARIS and GOODRICH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner, Standard Dry Wall Products, Inc., insists that there is not sufficient evidence on "the whole record" as that phrase is used in the Administrative Procedure Act, 60 Stat. 237, as amended, 5 U.S.C.A. § 1001 et seq. and the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 61 Stat. 136, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., in the light of the decisions of the Supreme Court in Universal Camera Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, 71 S.Ct. 456, and National Labor Relations Board v. Pittsburgh Steamship Company, 71 S.Ct. 453, to support the Board's findings that the petitioner violated Section 8(a) (1) and (3) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 61 Stat. 140, 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(a) (1) and (3). We conclude that the evidence supporting the Board's decision is substantial when viewed in the light furnished by the record in its entirety, including the body of evidence opposed to the Board's view. We are also of the opinion that the decision of the Board is reasonable and fair.

We will enforce the Board's order. A decree may be submitted.

To continue reading

Request your trial
798 cases
  • Good Samaritan Med. Ctr. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (1st Circuit)
    • May 31, 2017
    ......NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Cross-Petitioner. ...II. Legal Frameworks A. Standard of Review In examining factual determinations, the question ... Standard Dry Wall Products , 91 N.L.R.B. 544, 545 (1950), enforced , 188 ......
  • Kroger Limited Partnership I Mid-Atlantic and United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 400
    • United States
    • National Labor Relations Board
    • September 6, 2019
    ...preponderance of all the relevant evidence convinces us that they are incorrect. Standard Dry Walls Products, 91 NLRB 544 (1950), enfd. 188 F.2d 362 (3d Cir. 1951). We have carefully examined the record and find no basis for reversing the findings. [2] A second exception to the rule of Babc......
  • HTH Corp.
    • United States
    • National Labor Relations Board
    • October 24, 2014
    ...preponderance of all the relevant evidence convinces us that they are incorrect. Standard Dry Wall Products, 91 N.L.R.B. 544 (1950), enfd. 188 F.2d 362 (3d Cir. 1951). We have carefully examined the record and find no basis for reversing the findings. In adopting the judge's finding that th......
  • United Parcel Service, Inc. v. N.L.R.B.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • April 18, 1983
    ......v. . NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. . No. ... Our standard of review is whether there is substantial ... Graham Architectural Products Corp. v. NLRB, 697 F.2d 534, 542 (3d Cir.1983). ...Sept. 13, 1982) (No. 82-438); Standard Dry Wall Products, Inc., 91 N.L.R.B. 544 (1950), enforced, ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT