Standard Dry Wall Products v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Citation | 188 F.2d 362 |
Decision Date | 25 April 1951 |
Docket Number | No. 10317.,10317. |
Parties | STANDARD DRY WALL PRODUCTS, Inc., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. |
Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit) |
Thomas E. Whiteen, Pittsburgh, Pa., for petitioner.
Robert G. Johnson, Washington, D. C. (George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Ruth V. Russell, all of Washington, D. C., on the brief), Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board.
Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and MARIS and GOODRICH, Circuit Judges.
The petitioner, Standard Dry Wall Products, Inc., insists that there is not sufficient evidence on "the whole record" as that phrase is used in the Administrative Procedure Act, 60 Stat. 237, as amended, 5 U.S.C.A. § 1001 et seq. and the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 61 Stat. 136, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., in the light of the decisions of the Supreme Court in Universal Camera Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, 71 S.Ct. 456, and National Labor Relations Board v. Pittsburgh Steamship Company, 71 S.Ct. 453, to support the Board's findings that the petitioner violated Section 8(a) (1) and (3) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 61 Stat. 140, 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(a) (1) and (3). We conclude that the evidence supporting the Board's decision is substantial when viewed in the light furnished by the record in its entirety, including the body of evidence opposed to the Board's view. We are also of the opinion that the decision of the Board is reasonable and fair.
We will enforce the Board's order. A decree may be submitted.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Good Samaritan Med. Ctr. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
......NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Cross-Petitioner. ...II. Legal Frameworks A. Standard of Review In examining factual determinations, the question ... Standard Dry Wall Products , 91 N.L.R.B. 544, 545 (1950), enforced , 188 ......
-
Kroger Limited Partnership I Mid-Atlantic and United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 400
...preponderance of all the relevant evidence convinces us that they are incorrect. Standard Dry Walls Products, 91 NLRB 544 (1950), enfd. 188 F.2d 362 (3d Cir. 1951). We have carefully examined the record and find no basis for reversing the findings. [2] A second exception to the rule of Babc......
-
HTH Corp.
...preponderance of all the relevant evidence convinces us that they are incorrect. Standard Dry Wall Products, 91 N.L.R.B. 544 (1950), enfd. 188 F.2d 362 (3d Cir. 1951). We have carefully examined the record and find no basis for reversing the findings. In adopting the judge's finding that th......
-
United Parcel Service, Inc. v. N.L.R.B.
......v. . NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. . No. ... Our standard of review is whether there is substantial ... Graham Architectural Products Corp. v. NLRB, 697 F.2d 534, 542 (3d Cir.1983). ...Sept. 13, 1982) (No. 82-438); Standard Dry Wall Products, Inc., 91 N.L.R.B. 544 (1950), enforced, ......