Hughes v. Morris
Citation | 19 S.W. 481,110 Mo. 306 |
Court | United States State Supreme Court of Missouri |
Decision Date | 23 May 1892 |
Parties | HUGHES et al. v. MORRIS. |
Appeal from circuit court, Ray county; JAMES M. SANDUSKY, Judge.
Action by the banking house of J. S. Hughes & Co. against Morris for the recovery of specific personal property. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.
The other facts fully appear in the following statement by BARCLAY, J.:
The action is for the recovery of specific personal property. Defendant had judgment in the circuit court, and plaintiffs appealed in due form. The result depends on a chattel mortgage, mentioned in the opinion of the court, of which the material portions are the following, viz.:
C. T. Garner & Son and J. E. Black, for appellants. J. L. Farris and J. W. Shotwell, for respondent.
BARCLAY, J., (after stating the facts.)
This is a controversy over the possession of certain personal property worth $5,444.90, as the court and jury that tried the issues on the circuit found. Defendant is the sheriff of Ray county, claiming possession and a special property in the chattels by virtue of a levy on them under a writ of attachment, duly issued in favor of the Ray County Savings Bank. Plaintiffs,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Coates v. Smith
...So. 562, 14 L. R. A. 815, 30 Am. St. Rep. 106; Rackleff v. Norton, 19 Me. 274; King v. Merritt, 67 Mich. 194, 34 N.W. 689; Hughes v. Morris, 110 Mo. 306, 19 S.W. 481; Graham v. Whitely, 26 N. J. Law, 254; Bauer Schmelcher (City Ct. Brook.) 5 N.Y. Supp. 423; Beckel v. Petticrew, 6 Ohio St. 2......
-
Hatcher v. Hall
...53 Mo. 173, 175; 1 C.J.S., Acknowledgments, Sec. 91a, p. 851; 1 Am.Jur., Acknowledgments, Section 74, p. 344.4 Hughes v. Morris, 110 Mo. 306, 311, 19 S.W. 481, 482; annotation 25 A.L.R.2d 1124, 1131; annotation 29 A.L.R. 919, 921.5 Heintz v. Moore, 246 Mo. 226, 232, 151 S.W. 449, 450(2); Wi......
-
In re Baldin
...v. Magarahan, 87 Ga. 217, 13 S.E. 509; Henderson v. Grewell, 8 Cal. 581; Bryan v. Ramirez, 8 Cal. 462, 68 Am. Dec. 340; Hughes v. Morris, 110 Mo. 306, 19 S.W. 481; Hockman v. McClanahan, 87 Va. 33, 12 S.E. 230; O\'Ferrall v. Simplot, 4 G. Greene (Iowa) 162; Reynolds v. Kingsbury, 15 Iowa, 2......
-
Mathews v. O'Donnell
...law touching acknowledgments requires no more than a substantial compliance with its terms. Chauvin v. Wagner, 18 Mo. 531; Hughes v. Morris, 110 Mo. 305, 19 S. W. 481; Alexander v. Merry, 9 Mo. 514. In Gross v. Watts, 205 Mo. 373, loc. cit. 393 (syl. 4), 104 S. W. 30, loc. cit. 36 (121 Am. ......