U.S. of Amer. v. Camargo et al, MONTERO-CAMARG
Citation | 192 F.3d 946 |
Decision Date | 25 October 1999 |
Docket Number | N,SANCHEZ-GUILLE,D,No. 97-50643,MONTERO-CAMARG,97-50643 |
Parties | (9th Cir. 1999) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GERMAN ESPINOZAefendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LORENZOefendant-Appellant. o. 97-50645 |
Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit) |
Before: HUG, Chief Judge.
Order
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that these cases be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion, United States v. Montero-Camargo, 177 F.3d 1113 (9th Cir. 1999), is withdrawn.
To continue reading
Request your trial64 cases
- United States v. Deleon
-
United States v. Martinez
......for us to get the discovery." Dec. 13. Tr. at 46:11-15 (Harrison). Counsel for ......
-
State ex rel. Balderas v. Real Estate Law Ctr., P.C.
......Mr. Parwatikar's use of "we," "us," and "I" in discussing Real Estate Law issues suggests a close ......
-
New Mexico ex rel. Balderas v. Real Estate Law Ctr., P.C.
...... [ US vs. Whitmore, 359 F. 3d 609, 622 (D.C. Cir. 2004) ("the general rule .. ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Rehabilitating mental disorder evidence after Clark v. Arizona: of burdens, presumptions, and the right to raise reasonable doubt.
...admissible under the other rules 'is an extraordinary remedy and should be used sparingly.'" (quoting United States v. Rodriguez, 192 F.3d 946, 949 (10th Cir. (69) There are several reasons for these preferences. One important reason is that the government has vastly more resources than do ......