International Longshoremen's Association, Local 1416, AFL-CIO v. Ariadne Shipping Company

Decision Date21 February 1967
Docket NumberAFL-CI,A,No. 66--982,66--982
Citation195 So.2d 238
PartiesINTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 1416,ppellant, v. ARIADNE SHIPPING COMPANY, Limited, a Liberian corporation, and Evangeline Steamship Co., S.A., a Panamanian corporation, Appellees.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

An Interlocutory Appeal from Circuit Court for Dade County; Thomas E. Lee, Jr., Judge.

Kastenbaum, Mamber, Gopman, Epstein & Miles, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Shutts & Bowen and Cotton Howell, Muller, Schenerlein & Bare, Miami, for appellees.

Before CARROLL, BARKDULL and SWANN, JJ.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • International Longshoremen Local 1416 v. Ariadne Shipping Company
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • March 9, 1970
    ...affirmed by the District Court of Appeal for the Third District of Florida in a brief per curiam order citing McCulloch and Incres. 195 So.2d 238 (1967). Thereafter the Circuit Court, without further hearing, made the injunction permanent. The District Court of Appeal again affirmed, althou......
  • International Longshoremen's Ass'n, Local 1416, AFL-CIO v. Eastern S. S. Lines, Inc.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 2, 1968
    ...proceeding wherein this very union attempted to picket the foreign flag vessels. See: International Longshoremen's Association, Local 1416, AFL-CIO v. Ariadne Shipping Company, Fla.App.1967, 195 So.2d 238. The record fails to disclose any arguable labor dispute with the appellee, even thoug......
  • International Longshoremen's Ass'n, Local 1416, AFL-CIO v. Ariadne Shipping Co.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 29, 1968
    ...circuit court did, in fact, have jurisdiction over the dispute. We answered, in International Longshoremen's Association, Local 1416, AFL-CIO v. Ariadne Shipping Company, Ltd., Fla.App.1967, 195 So.2d 238, that it did have jurisdiction and could properly entertain the action. Thereafter, ba......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT