Holloway v. State, 96-3732
| Decision Date | 29 July 1999 |
| Docket Number | No. 96-3732,96-3732 |
| Citation | 197 F.3d 236 |
| Parties | (6th Cir. 1999) Sammye R. Holloway, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of Ohio, et al, Defendants-Appellees |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit |
Before: MARTIN, Chief Judge; MERRITT, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE, COLE, CLAY, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.
Prior Report - 179 F.3d 431
A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth circuit Rule 35(a) provides as follows:
"The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal."
Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court are vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.
It is further ORDERED that the appellant file a supplemental brief not later than Friday, September 3, 1999, and the appellees file a supplemental brief not later than Monday, October 4, 1999.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Holloway v. Brush
...in this case Sally Brush, may be entitled to immunity for her acts in connection with a child custody proceeding. See Holloway v. Ohio, 197 F.3d 236 (6th Cir. 1999). For the reasons that follow, we reverse the district court's ruling that Sally Brush enjoys absolute immunity for her conduct......
- Fedorca v. Perryman, 99-1527