1999 -NMSC- 11, Lopez v. Kase
Decision Date | 26 February 1999 |
Docket Number | No. 25,530,25,530 |
Parties | 1999 -NMSC- 11 Ron P. LOPEZ, District Attorney for the Seventh Judicial District, Petitioner, v. Hon. Edmund H. KASE, III, District Court Judge for the Seventh Judicial District, Respondent, and Patricia Ann Richardson, Real Party in Interest. |
Court | New Mexico Supreme Court |
¶1 Based on our interpretation of Article VII, Sections 1 and 2 of the New Mexico Constitution and the deference this Court owes the State's executive branch under separation of powers considerations, we determine that Patricia Ann Richardson is lawfully entitled to take office as a Sierra County Commissioner pursuant to her election to that position in November 1998 and the subsequent restoration of her full rights of citizenship by the Governor of New Mexico.
¶2 On March 17, 1998, Richardson filed a Declaration of Candidacy for the position of Sierra County Commissioner, District No. 2. After winning her party's nomination, Richardson was placed on the General Election ballot and thereafter won election by a large margin. Following consultation with her attorney, and prior to taking office, Richardson sought a Certificate of Restoration of Full Rights of Citizenship (Certificate) from the Governor.
¶3 Pursuant to NMSA 1978, § 31-21-17 (1955), the Governor's office requested that the Parole Board investigate and report on Richardson's application for executive clemency. A parole officer confirmed that, as disclosed by Richardson in her application, she had pled guilty in 1971 to False Entries in Bank Records in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1005 ( ). The parole officer's report also confirmed that the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico had accepted Richardson's plea, imposing a suspended sentence and two years' probation on her. The report further stated that Richardson, formerly a citizen of England, had not sought a pardon from the President of the United States or restoration of her civil rights from the Governor earlier because "she thought all her rights were restored when she was granted citizenship" upon her naturalization in January 1991. We note that when Richardson first registered to vote as a United States citizen in April 1991 she signed a standard voter registration form, certifying her belief that she was "NOT DENIED THE RIGHT TO VOTE BY A COURT OF LAW BY REASON OF LEGAL INSANITY OR FELONY CONVICTION."
¶4 In the opinion of the parole officer, The parole officer's report noted Richardson's expressed sentiments "that she has nothing to gain by holding office" and that she "would like to give back to the community what the community has given her, but she wants to do so legally." Upon receiving this report from the Parole Board, the Governor issued Richardson a Certificate restoring her rights to vote and to hold office in New Mexico on December 17, 1998.
¶5 A few days later, the District Attorney for the Seventh Judicial District in Socorro, New Mexico received an anonymous telephone call informing him of Richardson's felony conviction and her possible ineligibility to vote or hold public office as a result. On December 29, 1998, by facsimile, the District Attorney moved this Court for an emergency writ of prohibition or, alternatively a writ of mandamus, to prevent Richardson from being sworn in as a county commissioner later that day. See Rule 12-504 NMRA 1999 ( ). The District Attorney also requested a stay of Richardson's swearing-in ceremony, which this Court granted pending oral argument. Following oral argument on January 11, 1999, this Court orally denied the District Attorney's petition and lifted the stay. We now issue this written opinion to set forth our rationale for that decision. See Rule 12-405 NMRA 1999 ( ).
¶6 Before reaching the merits of the District Attorney's petition, we address Richardson's argument that the petition should be denied on the grounds that the District Attorney has an adequate remedy at law. Richardson is correct that this Court generally will not grant equitable relief by way of an extraordinary writ when there is an adequate remedy available to the petitioner at law, absent unusual and compelling circumstances. See Carter v. Montoya, 75 N.M. 730, 733, 410 P.2d 951, 953 (1966). See also State ex rel. Clark v. Johnson, 120 N.M. 562, 569, 904 P.2d 11, 18 (1995) ( ); District Court v. McKenna, 118 N.M. 402, 405, 881 P.2d 1387, 1390 (1994) ( ). See generally Charles T. Dumars and Michael B. Browde, Mandamus in New Mexico, 4 N.M.L.Rev. 155 (1974); Richard C. Bosson & Steven K. Sanders, The Writ of Prohibition in New Mexico, 5 N.M.L.Rev. 91 (1974). New Mexico law affords at least two statutory alternatives for removal of an elected official from office. See NMSA 1978, §§ 10-4-1 to 10-4-29 (1909) ( ); NMSA 1978, §§ 44-3-1 to 44-3-16 (1919) ( ).
¶7 We recognize that the foregoing statutory remedies appear on their face to apply solely to sworn incumbents, and therefore were probably not properly available to the District Attorney before Richardson took office. However, we also recognize that strong policy considerations weigh against our issuing a writ of prohibition or mandamus once an election has taken place. See Darr v. Village of Tularosa, 1998-NMCA-104, p 17, 125 N.M. 394, 962 P.2d 640 ( ); Jaramillo v. State ex rel. Board of County Comm'rs, 32 N.M. 20, 31-32, 250 P. 729, 733 (1926) ( ). While we are inclined to think that a post-election petition for an extraordinary writ is generally less likely to present a compelling need for immediate relief in this Court than a pre-election petition, cf. State ex rel. Chavez v. Evans, 79 N.M. 578, 582-83, 446 P.2d 445, 449-50 (1968) ( ), we do not resolve the matter on that basis. We do not want to foreclose post-election, pre-installation relief in this Court by extraordinary writ in future cases with more compelling merits. For this reason and because the merits of this petition can be so easily and expeditiously resolved, we decide this case on the substantive arguments presented to us by the parties instead of requiring them to begin anew in district court. Cf. Thompson v. Legislative Audit Comm'n, 79 N.M. 693, 694-95, 448 P.2d 799, 800-01 (1968) ( ).
¶8 Richardson contends, as she suggested to the parole officer, that her naturalization, in addition to granting her United States citizenship, had the effect of automatically conferring on her the right to vote and the right to hold office in New Mexico. She is incorrect. While naturalization of United States citizens lies within the exclusive province of the federal government, see 8 U.S.C. § 1421 (1994); cf. Sudomir v. McMahon, 767 F.2d 1456, 1464 (9th Cir.1985) ( ), the United States Constitution allows states to prohibit persons convicted of crimes from voting or holding state or local offices. See U.S. Const. amend. XIV, § 2; Richardson v. Ramirez, 418 U.S. 24, 41-56, 94 S.Ct. 2655, 41 L.Ed.2d 551 (1974) ( ). Thus, whether Richardson is qualified to hold the office of Sierra County Commissioner is a question of state law not federal law.
¶9 Article VII, Section 2(A) of the New Mexico Constitution provides: "Every citizen of the United States who is a legal resident of the state and is a qualified elector therein, shall be qualified to hold any elective public office except as otherwise provided in this constitution." (Emphasis added.) Section 1 of Article VII disqualifies as electors "persons convicted of a felonious or infamous crime unless restored to political rights." See also NMSA 1978, § 31-13-1(A) (1963) (); NMSA 1978, § 10-1-2 (1912) (). Article V, Section 6 states that "the governor shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons." See also NMSA 1978, § 31-13-1(C) (1963) ().
¶10...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Abraham v. WPX Energy Prod., LLC
... ... Cf. Lopez v. Kase, 1999NMSC011, 6, 126 N.M. 733, 975 P.2d 346, 348 (stating that ... ...
-
Hunt v. N.C. Logistics, Inc.
... ... Cf Lopez v. Kase , 1999NMSC011, 6, 126 N.M. 733, 975 P.2d 346, 348 (stating that ... 12.0319 , 134 N.C.App. 22, 35, 517 S.E.2d 134, 143 (1999) ("Restricting conventional subrogation provisions in insurance policies ... ...
-
Thornton v. The Kroger Co.
... ... Rental Co., Inc. v. Kent ... Nowlin Const., Inc. , 1987-NMSC-114, ¶ 17, 106 N.M ... 539, 746 P.2d 645, 648-49)). Thornton quotes ... Oncology Assocs. , ... 198 F.3d 489, 495-96 (4th Cir. 1999)(citing Grupo ... Mexicano de Desarrollo, S.A. v. Alliance Bond ... a complete and adequate remedy at law”). Cf. Lopez ... v. Kase , 1999-NMSC-011, ¶ 6, 975 P.2d 346, 348, 126 ... ...
-
Skyline Potato Co. v. Tan-O-On Mktg., Inc., CIV 10-0698 JB/RHS
...although properly pleaded, because appellee in fact had anPage 182adequate remedy at law."). Cf Lopez v. Kase, 1999-NMSC-011, j 6, 975 P.2d 346, 348 (stating that the Supreme Court of New Mexico "generally will not grant equitable relief by way of an extraordinary writ when there is an adeq......