State v. Proctor

Decision Date20 December 1886
PartiesSTATE v. PROCTOR.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

The Attorney General, for the State. Bristow & Lighter, for appellant, Proctor.

NORTON, J.

Defendant was tried in the circuit court of Monroe county, and convicted, and fined $20, under an indictment charging him with obstructing a public road in said county. From this judgment he has appealed, and insists by his counsel that, inasmuch as defendant was indicted in April, 1883, under the law as it stood in the Revision of 1879, and inasmuch as the law of 1879 was repealed by an act of the legislature in 1883, (Acts 1883, p. 170, § 60,) having no saving clause as respects penalties for past offenses, that for that reason the court erred in overruling his objection to the introduction of any evidence under the indictment. The point thus made is fully answered by section 3151, Rev. St., which is as follows: "No offense committed, and no fine, penalty, or forfeiture incurred, previous to the time when any statutory provision shall be repealed, shall be affected by such repeal; but the trial and punishment of all such offenses, and the recovery of such fines, penalties, and forfeitures, shall be had in all respects as if the provision had remained in full force."

The court, by its instructions...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Bauman v. Boeckeler
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 23 December 1893
    ...v. How, 27 Mo. 211; Becker v. City, 38 Mo. 13; Gowan v. Co., 5 Watts & S. 141; Harkness v. Woodmansee, 26 P. (Utah), 291; State v. Proctor, 90 Mo. 334. (9) There was evidence to designate and define the extent of a public use of the premises where the alleged accident occurred such as to co......
  • Burlington & C. Ry. v. Schweikart
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • 15 June 1887
    ... ... 784; Hoadley v ... City and County of San Francisco, (Cal.) 12 P. 125; Town of ... San Leandro v. Le Breton, (Cal.) 13 P. 405; State v. Proctor, ... (Mo.) 2 S.W. 472; Kennedy v. Mayor, etc., of Cumberland, ... (Md.) 9 A ... ...
  • California Special Road Dist. v. Bueker
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 1 March 1926
    ...to prove establishment by user for the prescriptive period at the place where defendant had put the corner of his fence. State v. Proctor, 2 S. W. 472, 90 Mo. 334; State v. Davis, 27 Mo. App. 624; State v. Bradley, 31 Mo. App. Having acquired the road by user, at the point in controversy, t......
  • Bauman v. Boeckeler
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 27 November 1893
    ...the owner for the period of 10 years. State v. Young, 27 Mo. 259; State v. Walters, 69 Mo. 463; State v. Wells, 70 Mo. 635; State v. Proctor, 90 Mo. 334, 2 S. W. 472; Price v. Town of Breckenridge, 92 Mo. 378, 5 S. W. 20. And, where the intent of the owner to dedicate is clearly shown aliun......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT