Resolution Trust Corp. v. Dunmar Corp.

• Citation: 20 F.3d 397
• Decision Date: 12 April 1994
• Docket Number: No. 91-3924,91-3924
• Parties: RESOLUTION TRUST CORP., Plaintiff, v. DUNMAR CORP. and Michael D. Jones, Defendants-Counterclaim Plaintiffs, The First F.A., Defendant-Counterclaim Defendant, Sherman Dantzler and Jack Shirek, Defendants, and The First F.A. of Orlando and Resolution Trust Corp., Counter-Defendants. Michael D. JONES; Robert S. Guskiewicz; R.S. Futch, Jr., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. RESOLUTION TRUST CORP., Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Philip DONLEVY; William Crawford; Robert Stone, Defendants, v. SEMINOLE FLYING AND SOARING, INC., and The First F.A. of Orlando, Third Party Defendants. RESOLUTION TRUST CORP., Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellee, v. LAKE PICKETT, LTD., a Florida Limited Partnership; Michael D. Jones, as general partner, d/b/a Lake Pickett, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership; Michael D. Jones, individually and as Trustee, Defendants-Counter-Plaintiffs-Appellants, The First F.A. of Orlando, Defendant.
• Court: United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (11th Circuit)

Page 397

20 F.3d 397

RESOLUTION TRUST CORP., Plaintiff, v. DUNMAR CORP. and Michael D. Jones, Defendants-Counterclaim Plaintiffs, The First F.A., Defendant-Counterclaim Defendant, Sherman Dantzler and Jack Shirek, Defendants,

and

The First F.A. of Orlando and Resolution Trust Corp.,

Counter-Defendants.

Michael D. JONES; Robert S. Guskiewicz; R.S. Futch, Jr., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. RESOLUTION TRUST CORP., Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Philip DONLEVY; William Crawford; Robert Stone, Defendants, v. SEMINOLE FLYING AND SOARING, INC., and The First F.A. of

Orlando, Third Party Defendants.

RESOLUTION TRUST CORP., Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellee, v. LAKE PICKETT, LTD., a Florida Limited Partnership; Michael

D. Jones, as general partner, d/b/a Lake Pickett, Ltd., a

Florida Limited Partnership; Michael D. Jones, individually

and as Trustee, Defendants-Counter-Plaintiffs-Appellants,

The First F.A. of Orlando, Defendant.

No. 91-3924.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

April 12, 1994.

Broad and Cassel, Brenda Lee London, Robert D. Gatton, Orlando, FL, for appellants.

Giles, Hedrick & Robinson, P.A., Orlando, FL, E. Givens Goodspeed, Kirk K. Van Tine, Baker & Botts, Washington, DC, for appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (Nos. 89-205-Civ-Orl-19, 89-207-Civ-Orl-19, 89-208-Civ-Orl-19), Patricia C. Fawsett, Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion November 23, 1993, 11th Cir., 1993, 7 F.3d 1006)

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.