NATIONAL USED CAR MKT. REPORT v. NATIONAL AUTO. D. ASS'N
Decision Date | 20 November 1952 |
Docket Number | No. 11390.,11390. |
Citation | 91 US App. DC 313,200 F.2d 359 |
Parties | NATIONAL USED CAR MARKET REPORT, Inc. v. NATIONAL AUTOMOBILE DEALERS ASS'N et al. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit |
Bernard I. Nordlinger, Washington, D. C., with whom Milton W. King, Wallace Luchs, Jr., and Robert B. Frank, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellant.
Leo F. Tierney, Chicago, Ill., with whom Gordon L. Eakle and James C. Moore, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellees.
Before EDGERTON, WILBUR K. MILLER, and FAHY, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiff's complaint attempts to state claims under the Sherman Act, 50 Stat. 693, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1, the Clayton Act, 49 Stat. 1526, 15 U.S.C.A. § 13(a), and the Robinson-Patman Act, 49 Stat. 1528, 15 U.S.C. § 13a. The defendants are two corporations and several individuals some of whom are officers of both. We think the District Court was right, for the reasons it gave, in dismissing counts 2 and 3 of the complaint. National Used Car Market Report, Inc. v. National Automobile Dealers Ass'n, D.C., 108 F.Supp. 692. But we think the court erred in dismissing count 1.
Count 1 alleges among other things that the members of the defendant National Automobile Dealers Association are 30,000 of the 43,000 new car dealers in the United States; that the defendant National Automobile Dealers Used Car Guide Company publishes a used car price list or "Guide"; and that the defendants are engaged in a combination in restraint of interstate commerce the effects of which include a "boycott" of the pocket-size used car price list or "Blue Book" which plaintiff publishes in competition with the "Guide"; more specifically, "an agreement and concert of action among defendant corporations (producers) and their members (consumers) not to purchase plaintiff's pocket-size `Blue Book'". If this allegation were construed strictly against the pleader, it might be taken to mean only that two or three of the Association's 30,000 members agreed not to buy plaintiff's book. But the allegation must be construed favorably, not strictly. Callaway v. Hamilton National Bank of Washington, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 228, 195 F.2d 556, 559. Construed favorably, the quoted allegations of the complaint may mean that all 30,000 members of the Association agreed not to buy plaintiff's book.
The District Court took the view that before an action may be maintained under § 1 of the Sherman Act ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Blake Construction Co. v. American Vocational Ass'n, Inc.
...Distilling Corp. v. Humphrey, 95 U.S.App.D.C. 104, 108, 220 F. 2d 367, 371 (1954); National Used Car Market Report, Inc. v. National Auto. Dealers Ass'n, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 313-314, 200 F.2d 359-360 (1952); Callaway v. Hamilton Nat'l Bank, 90 U.S. App.D.C. 228, 231, 195 F.2d 556, 559 (1952); M......
-
Interborough News Co. v. Curtis Publishing Co.
...10, 97 L.Ed. 635; National Used Car Market Report v. National Auto. Dealers Ass'n, D.C.D.C., 108 F.Supp. 692, 694, modified 91 U.S. App.D.C. 313, 200 F.2d 359. 1 6 Moore's Fed.Prac., 2d Ed., para. 54.41 3, n. 10, p. 2 F.R.Civ.P. 52(a). 3 5 Moore's Fed.Prac., 2d Ed., para. 52.03 3, p. 2632. ......
-
Vance v. Safeway Stores
...The Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia, in affirming that decision in the case of National Used Car Market Report v. National Auto Dealers Association, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 313, 200 F.2d 359, apparently approved of the lower court's ruling that no civil action is available to a private......
-
Parmelee Transportation Co. v. Keeshin
...rendered declined manifestly sets forth a public rather than a merely private injury. National Used Car Market Reports v. National Automobile Dealers Ass'n, 1952, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 313, 200 F.2d 359. Defendants insist with considerable vigor that the complaint must fail because there is no al......