Ferguson v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
| Decision Date | 17 August 1967 |
| Docket Number | 7 Div. 762 |
| Parties | Willie FERGUSON v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY. |
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Ed. W. Harwell, Anniston, for appellant.
Lybrand, Sides & Hamner, Anniston, for appellee.
This is a suit on an insurance policy wherein appellee, hereinafter referred to as State Farm, insured the life of J. W. Ferguson, husband of appellant, in the amount of $10,000.
The case involves the construction of an exclusion clause of a death indemnity coverage in the policy. The trial court granted the general affirmative charge in favor of appellee at the conclusion of the evidence. This appeal followed.
The facts are as follows:
State Farm issued a policy of insurance to J. W. Ferguson and Willie Ferguson, covering their 1960 Dodge automobile. The policy, insofar as here material, provided:
'* * * AUTOMOBILE DEATH INDEMNITY * * *
'COVERAGE S
'(State Farm agrees) To pay the principal sum ($10,000) * * * in the event of the death of each insured (J. W. Ferguson) which shall result directly and independently of all other causes from bodily injury caused by accident and sustained by the insured while occupying or through being struck by an automobile * * *. (Par. Added)
'* * *.
'DEFINITIONS * * *
'* * * 'Automobile--means a land motor vehicle, trailer, or semitrailer not operated on rails or crawler-treads, but does not mean: (1) a farm type tractor or other equipment designed for use principally off public roads, except while actually upon public roads, or (2) a land motor vehicle or trailer while located for use as a residence or premises and not as a vehicle, or (3) any vehicle while being used for racing, or (4) any military vehicle.'
The exclusion section applicable to Coverage 'S' provides that the insuring agreement does not apply:
'(a) to bodily injury sustained in the course of his occupation by any person while engaged (1) in duties incident to the operation, loading or unloading of, or as an assistant on, a public or livery conveyance or Commercial automobile * * *.' (Emphasis Supplied)
With this policy in force Mr. Ferguson was killed on November 6, 1962, while operating a road machine (caterpillar road scraping machine) in the course of his employment as an operator of such machines for the County of Calhoun. At the time of his death Mr. Ferguson was engaged in scraping a public road in Calhoun County and in turning the machine around he backed it into a fill area, off to the side of the road, causing the machine to turn over on top of him, causing instant death.
The facts were not disputed. The trial court gave the affirmative charge at the request of State Farm based upon his opinion that as a matter of law the coverage provided by the policy did not extend to the accident involved because it was excluded under section (a) above. In other words, it was the opinion of the trial...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Maryland Am. Gen. Ins. Co. v. Ramsay
...bears directly on the question presented by this appeal. We have not found such a case. However, Ferguson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 281 Ala. 295, 202 So.2d 81 (1967), is analogous to the case at bar. In that case, Ferguson, while operating a caterpillar road machine......
- Burns v. State, 1 Div. 432
-
Farmers Ins. Exchange v. Loesche
...has a meaning readily ascertainable in the plain, ordinary and popular sense of the language used. See Ferguson v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 281 Ala. 295, 202 So.2d 81 (1967). While we agree with appellee that not all business-owned vehicles are commercial, Hendricks v. American Emplo......
-
Peterick v. Mutual of Enumclaw Ins. Co.
...ambiguous within the rule that ambiguous provisions of a policy are to be construed against the insurer. Ferguson v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co., 281 Ala. 295, 202 So.2d 81 (1967); Hardee v. Southern Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co., 127 So.2d 220 (La.App.1961). In order to state that words a......