Mills Estate v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
| Decision Date | 05 August 1953 |
| Docket Number | No. 101,Docket 22430.,101 |
| Citation | 206 F.2d 244 |
| Parties | MILLS ESTATE, Inc. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. MILLS ESTATE, Inc. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
Charles S. Lyon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack, Helen Goodner and Joseph F. Goetten, Sp. Assts. to the Atty. Gen., H. Brian Holland, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner, commissioner.
William H. Hayes and J. Wesley Seward, New York City, for petitioner, taxpayer.
Before SWAN, Chief Judge, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND and CHASE, Circuit Judges.
Both the Commissioner and the taxpayer have petitioned to review a decision of the Tax Court redetermining the deficiencies here questioned.
A deduction of the amount of fees and expenses paid in 1946 to attorneys was claimed under section 23(a) (1) (A) I.R. C., 26 U.S.C.A. § 23(a) (1) (A), as an ordinary and necessary expense paid during the taxable year in carrying on the taxpayer's trade or business. It was disallowed by the Commissioner. The Tax Court, allowing one-half as an expense attributable to the cost of carrying out a partial liquidation and disallowing the remainder as a capital expense attributable to the cost of a reorganization, redetermined the deficiencies accordingly. The taxpayer's position is that the entire amount claimed as deductible should have been allowed, and the Commissioner's is that none of it was allowable.
There is no dispute as to the facts. The taxpayer is a closely held New York corporation, having its principal place of business in the City of New York. It was organized primarily to acquire and hold as an investment all of the capital stock of a California corporation, Mills Estate, Incorporated, and to take title to, and operate, certain improved real estate in New York City. It originally had an authorized capital stock of $5,000,000 consisting of 50,000 shares, each of the par value of $100.
In 1917, it acquired all of the California corporation's stock and New York City improved real estate in return for all of its own stock with the exception of five shares issued to its directors as qualifying shares. It continued to hold and operate this real estate until 1941, when it sold it for $3,625,000 and discontinued that part of its business. Then it became a personal holding company and liable for surtaxes as such.
Its resulting tax situation was given consideration, and the directors, in order to make it less onerous, decided upon and made pro rata cash distribution to its stockholders of $3,630,000, of which $2,200,000 was charged to capital and $1,430,000 to surplus.
Necessary compliance with the law of New York1 required changes in the corporation's capital structure so that after the proposed distribution had been made its remaining assets, computed in accordance with such law, would at least be equal to the aggregate amount of its debts, including capital. Such changes were made by reducing the authorized amount of capital stock from $5,000,000 to $2,800,000 and the number of shares from 50,000 having a par of $100 to 28,000 having the same par value, by the surrender of 22,000 shares of stock to the taxpayer which were then cancelled, and by the surrender of the remaining 28,000 shares for which new certificates were issued.
In 1946 the taxpayer paid its attorneys $20,000 for their services and $101.66 to reimburse them for their expenses in connection with this entire matter. There was no allocation of any part of the payment between the cost of the alteration of the capital structure of the corporation and the cost of the distribution of the cash. The taxpayer kept its books and filed its returns on a cash basis and in its 1946 returns took a deduction for the entire amount paid. No question is raised as to the reasonableness of it. Although there was no basis in the record for a precise allocation, the Tax Court, relying somewhat upon Cohan v. Commissioner, 2 Cir., 39 F.2d 540, 543-544, divided it in half and found and held "that one-half of the expenditure in question was made with respect to reconstituting the stock of petitioner and related matters, with the result that such one-half must be treated as a non-deductible capital item; and that the other one-half was made with respect to the distribution of assets, which we hold to be deductible." Two judges dissented on the ground that the entire expense was a non-deductible capital expenditure.
To the extent that the Tax Court allowed deduction, it relied on the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals in Pacific Coast Biscuit Co. v. Commissioner, 32 B.T.A. 39, and decisions which followed it, such as Laster v. Commissioner, 43 B.T.A. 159, affirmed in part and reversed in part on other grounds, 5 Cir., 128 F.2d 4, and Rite-Way Products Inc., 12 T.C. 475, holding that the expense of a complete liquidation of a corporation was deductible as an ordinary and necessary business expense. It then held that the expense of a partial liquidation was indistinguishable in respect to deductibility. Such...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Indopco, Inc v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
...longer than the current taxable year." General Bancshares Corp. v. Commissioner, 326 F.2d, at 715. See also Mills Estate, Inc. v. Commissioner, 206 F.2d 244, 246 (CA2 1953). The rationale behind these decisions applies equally to the professional charges at issue in this The expenses that N......
-
A.E. Staley Mfg. Co. & Subsidiaries v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue
...& Curr Co. v. Commissioner, 15 T.C. 106 (1951) and Mills Estate Inc. v. Commissioner, 17 T.C. 910 (1952), revd. and remanded 206 F.2d 244 (2d Cir.1953), with Galt v. Commissioner, 19 T.C. 892 (1953), affd. in part and revd. in part 216 F.2d 41 (7th Cir.1954). 8. The approach suggested here ......
-
A.E. Staley Mfg. Co. and Subsidiaries v. C.I.R.
...Commissioner, 688 F.2d 1376 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1207, 103 S.Ct. 3537, 77 L.Ed.2d 1388 (1983); Mills Estate, Inc. v. Commissioner, 206 F.2d 244 (2d Cir.1953); Fishing Tackle Products Co. v. Commissioner, 27 T.C. 638, 645, 1957 WL 892 (1957). Justice Blackmun, quoting from......
-
McCrory Corp. v. U.S., 775
...a corporation incident to a capital reorganization also are capital expenditures and not currently deductible. Mills Estate, Inc. v. Commissioner, 206 F.2d 244, 246 (2d Cir. 1953); Skenandoa Rayon Corp. v. Commissioner, 122 F.2d 268 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 314 U.S. 696, 62 S.Ct. 413, 86 L.......
-
Takeover defense expenditures: deductibility not necessarily precluded by National Starch.
...and rejected by the IRS in TAM 8927005 (Mar. 27, 1989). See also American Properties,28 T.C. 1100 (1957). (5) See e.g., Mills Estate Inc., 206 F.2d 244, 246 (2d Cir. 1953) (recapitalization); Denver & Salt Lake Ry., 24 T.C. 709,719 (1955), dismissed pursuant to stipulation, 234 F.2d 663......
-
Indopco v. Commissioner: the Supreme Court takes National Starch to the cleaners.
...Farmers Union Corp. v. Commissioner, 300 F.2d 197, 200 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 861 (1962); Mills Estate, Inc. v. Commissioner, 206 F.2d 244, 246 (2d Cir. 1953). (19) See, e.g., Missouri-Kansas Pipeline Co. v. Commissioner, 148 F.2d 460, 462 (3d Cir. 1945) (distribution to stockho......
-
Deductibility of legal expenses in corporate reorganizations.
...a whole and its dominant aspect is to govern the tax character of the expenditures" (Mills Estate, Inc., 17 TC 910 (1951), rev'd in part, 206 F2d 244 (2d Cir. 1953)). The dominant aspect in this instance, the courts reasoned, was the partial liquidation and not the Similarly, certain involu......