Central of Georgia Railway Company v. William Wricht No 85 Georgia Railroad Banking Company v. William Wright No 89

Decision Date18 November 1907
Docket Number89,No. 85,Nos. 85,s. 85,85
PartiesCENTRAL OF GEORGIA RAILWAY COMPANY, Plff. in Err., v. WILLIAM A. WRICHT, Comptroller General of Georgia, and John W. Nelms, Sheriff of Fulton County. NO 85. GEORGIA RAILROAD & BANKING COMPANY, Plff. in Err., v. WILLIAM A. WRIGHT, Comptroller General of Georgia, and John W. Nelms, Sheriff of Fulton County. NO 89
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Messrs. T. M. Cunningham, Jr., Henry C. Cunningham, A. R. Lawton, and Alexander C. King, for plaintiff in error in No. 85.

Mr. John C. Hart for defendants in error in No. 85.

Messrs. Joseph R. Lamar, Joseph B. Cumming, and Alex. C. King for plaintiff in error in No. 89.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 128-130 intentionally omitted] Messrs. Boykin Wright and John C. Hart for defendants in error in No. 89.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 130-131 intentionally omitted] Mr. Justice Day delivered the opinion of the court:

These cases are writs of error to the supreme court of the state of Georgia, in suits brought to enjoin the collection of certain taxes. In the view we take of them they may be considered together.

Actions were begun by the plaintiffs in error, in the superior court of Fulton county, to enjoin the enforcement of executions in the hands of the sheriff, issued for taxes assessed by the comptroller general on shares of the corporate stock of the Western Railway of Alabama, an Alabama corporation, which stock was alleged to be held and owned by the plaintiffs in error.

The superior court refused to award an injunction.

Upon writs of error the supreme court affirmed the judgments of the court below. 124 Ga. 596, 630, 53 S. E. 251, 207. The cases were remitted to the superior court of Fulton county and that court rendered final decrees in favor of the defendants below, holding the tax executions to be lawful. The cases were again taken to the supreme court of Georgia and there affirmed. 125 Ga. 589, 617, 54 S. E. 52, 64.

The question of the taxability of these shares was a matter of litigation in the Federal courts of the Georgia district, and it was held such shares were not taxable. 116 Fed. 669 Affirmed in the court of appeals, 54 C. C. A. 672, 117 Fed. 1007. The latter case was reversed and the stock held taxable in the case of Wright v. Louisville & N. R. Co. decided by this court at the October term, 1904. 195 U. S. 219, 49 L. ed. 167, 25 Sup. Ct. Rep. 16.

Thereupon says the supreme court of Georgia:

'On January 27, 1905, the comptroller general wrote to the president of the Georgia Railroad & Banking Company the following letter: 'The Supreme Court of the United States having recently held, as you doubtless are aware, that the shares of stock of the Western Railway of Alabama owned by the Georgia Railroad & Banking Company are taxable in Georgia, it becomes my duty to assess these shares of stock for taxation for each of the years in which they are in default for their taxes. This assessment is required to be made by the comptroller general from 'the best information obtainable.' I desire to proceed to the discharge of this duty intelligently, and therefore respectfully request you to furnish me any data in your possession which will enable me to make perfectly fair, just, and legal assessments of this property. From your long connection with the property as president of the Georgia Railroad & Banking company, and your familiarity with its value, you doubtless are in possession of information which will very greatly aid me in making an equitable assessment of the property. I trust, therefore, you will submit at your earliest possible convenience any facts or suggestions bearing upon this line which you may deem proper. I would be glad to have any data which you may submit with reference to its value for each year, beginning with the year 1883, the year I am informed your corporation became the owner of these shares of stock. I expect to proceed with this matter some time the early part of next week, if possible.' Other correspondence took place between the comptroller general and various officers of the Georgia railroad, including the general counsel, who eventually submitted to the comptroller general a statement regarding what he considered the value of the railroad property in question, together with a tabulated statement of the dividends which the Georgia railroad had received from the stock, at the same time protesting that the stock was not liable for taxation, and refusing to make any return of it for that purpose. The comptroller general thereupon, according to his affidavit, 'assessed the same from the best information obtainable.' It is insisted with great earnestness and ability that the levy of executions under these circumstances, without giving notice to the railroad company or allowing it any opportunity to be heard as to the basis of valuation upon which the assessment was made, amounted to a seizure of its property without due process of law. It is not claimed that the comptroller general has violated the provisions of any existing statute, but that the laws of Georgia do not provide for the collection of taxes on omitted property after a return has been made by the taxpayer and accepted by the comptroller general.'

The first and perhaps principal question argued in the case arises upon the contention of the plaintiffs in error that the method of assessment provided for the taxation of property in such cases as the present, as laid down in the statutes of the state of Georgia, as construed by the supreme court of the state, do not afford the taxpayer due process of law. The pertinent sections of the Political Code of Georgia are copied in the margin.

Section 804. Returns to Comptroller, How Made. The returns of all companies or persons required to be made to the comptroller general must be in writing and sworn to by the presiding officer, etc.

Section 805. Ruturns and Taxes, etc. The returns of all railroad and insurance and express companies, and agents of foreign companies, authorized in this state, shall be made to the comptroller general by the first day of May in each year, and the taxes thereof paid to the state treasurer by the first day of October, and not later than December twentieth of each year.

Section 812. Returns to Comptroller Must be Itemized. Whenever corporations, companies, persons, agencies, or institutions are required by law to make returns of property, or gross receipts, or business, or income, gross, annual, net, or any other kind, or any other return, to the comptroller general, for taxation, such return shall contain an itemized statement of property, each class or species to be separately named and valued, or an itemized account of gross receipts, or business, or income, as above defined, or othermatters required to be returned, and in case of net income only, an itemized account of gross receipts and expenditures, to show how the income returned is ascertained, and such returns shall be carefully scrutinized by the comptroller general, and if, in his judgment, the property embraced therein is returned below its value, he shall assess the value, within sixty day thereafter, from any information he can obtain, and if he shall find a return of gross receipts, or business, or income, as above defined, or other Of the system of taxation thus provided the supreme court of Georgia, in a summary of its provisions, says:

'The Political Code, § 812, prescribes the method by which 'corporations, companies, persons, agencies, or institutions,' shall make returns of their property to the comptroller general for taxation, and provides that 'such returns shall be carefully scrutinized by the comptroller general, and if, in his judgment, the property embraced therein is returned below its value, he shal assess the value, within sixty days thereafter, from any information he can obtain, and if he shall find a return of . . . matters required to be returned as aforesaid, below the true amount, or false in any particular, or in anywise contrary to law, he shall correct the same and assess the true amount, from the best information at his command, within sixty days. In all cases of assessment, or of correction of returns, as herein provided, the officer or person making such returns shall receive notice and shall have the privilege, within twenty days after such notice, to refer the question of true value or amount, as the case may be, to arbitrators, . . . and their award shall be final.' Section 813 is as follows: 'In cases of failure to make return, the comptroller general shall make an assessment from the best information he can procure, which assessment shall be conclusive upon said corporations, companies, persons, agencies, or institutions.' By § 814 it is provided that 'in all cases of default of payment of taxes upon returns or assessments, the comptroller general shall enforce collections in the manner now provided by law.' 'If any corporation, company, person, agency, or institution, who are required to make their returns to the comptroller general, shall fail to return the taxable property or specifics, or pay annually the taxes for which they are liable to the state treasury, the comptroller general shall issue against them an execution for the amount of taxes due, according to law, together with the costs and penalties.' Section 874. 'When there is no return by which to assess the tax, the comptroller general shall, from the best information he can procure, assess in his discretion.' Section 879. These sections of the Political Code are thus set out in order that we may have before us at the outset the various statutes bearing on the power of the comptroller general to collect taxes on property which has not been returned. And at this point we will take occasion to say that, in our opinion, all considerations of the good faith of the railroad...

To continue reading

Request your trial
169 cases
  • Kash Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles
    • United States
    • California Supreme Court
    • April 15, 1977
    ...v. Armour Fertilizer Works (1915) 237 U.S. 413, 424--425, 35 S.Ct. 625, 629, 59 L.Ed. 1027; see, e.g., Central of Georgia Ry. v. Wright (1907) 207 U.S. 127, 138, 28 S.Ct. 47, 52 L.Ed. 134.) 8 At the time of the preliminary injunction hearing, the city charged newsrack owners a fee of $25 fo......
  • State ex rel. Forman v. Wheatley
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • March 19, 1917
    ... ... Taxation (3 Ed.), 786; State Railroad Tax Cases, 92 U.S. 575, ... 609. Some of the ... "Section ... 85. The legislature shall provide by general law for ... 177; Lumber Co. v. Harrison Co., 89 Miss. 171; ... Flora v. Express Co., 92 Miss ... 67; Stock Food Co. v. Wright, 225 U.S. 540; So ... Railway Co. v. King, ... 51 ... The ... Bi-Metallic Company v. State Board of Equalization case is ... the ... 204, 208, ... 27 S.Ct. 87; Central of Georgia R. Co. v. Wright, ... 207 U.S. 127, ... ...
  • People ex rel. State Bd. of Equalization v. Pitcher
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • January 12, 1914
    ... ... Dews, determined by the Superior Court of Georgia, ... R. M. Charlt. 397, this question is ... Constitution--the central idea which pervades that instrument ... in ... railroad property by the State Board of Equalization. And ... and a separate hearing? If a railroad company is by law ... entitled to such notice, surely ... Otero ... 20,953,075 89,847 21,042,922 ... Ouray ... Central Ry. Co. v. Wright, 207 U.S. 127, 28 S.Ct. 47, 52 ... L.Ed. 134, 12 ... ...
  • Scott v. Scott
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • April 25, 1947
    ... ... City of Knoxville v. Gervin, 169 Tenn. 532, 89 ... S.W.2d 348, 103 A.L.R. 885, and Goodyear ... them to Cone Brothers Construction Company in payment [158 ... Fla. 784] of its work on ... 663, 28 ... L.Ed. 569; Kentucky Railroad Tax Cases [Cincinnati, N. O ... & T. P. R. Co ... 323, 27 S.Ct. 87, 51 ... L.Ed. 205; Central of Georgia R. Co. v. Wright, 207 ... U.S. 127, ... Pittsburgh, etc., ... Railway Co. v. Backus, 154 U.S. 421, 426, 38 L.Ed. 1031, ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT