Workman v. Bell, 96-6652
| Decision Date | 04 April 2000 |
| Docket Number | 00-5367,No. 96-6652,96-6652 |
| Citation | 209 F.3d 940 |
| Parties | (6th Cir. 2001) Philip R. WORKMAN, Petitioner-Appellant v. Ricky BELL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee Philip R. Workman, Movant |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit |
Before: MARTIN, Chief Judge; MERRITT, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE, COLE, CLAY and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.
A majority of the Judges of this court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this matter en banc. Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 35(a) it is ORDERED that the court's order of March 31, 2000 is vacated and the matter is restored to the court's active docket.
It is further ORDERED that the petitioner shall file a supplemental brief not later than Monday, April 17, 2000, and the respondent shall file a supplemental brief not later than Monday, May 1, 2000. The Clerk will schedule the matter for oral argument at the earliest practicable date as directed by the court.
The motion for a stay of the execution scheduled for April 6, 2000 is GRANTED, such stay to remain in effect until further order of the court.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Workman v. Bredesen
...of being executed by lethal injection but he did not challenge the procedure before (or after) a stay was issued. Workman v. Bell, 209 F.3d 940 (6th Cir. 2000) (en banc). In January 2001, he came within five days of execution but did not challenge the procedure before (or after) a stay was ......