Young v. State

Decision Date17 September 1974
Docket NumberNo. 49503,No. 1,49503,1
Citation209 S.E.2d 96,132 Ga.App. 790
PartiesRussell YOUNG v. The STATE
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Albert M. Horn, Lawrence L. Schneider, Atlanta, for appellant.

Hinson McAuliffe, Sol., James L. Webb, Frank A. Bowers, Asst. Sols., Atlanta, for appellee.

Syllabus Opinion by the Court

BELL, Chief Judge.

The defendant, a 17-year-old high school student, was observed on the premises of the public school that he attended in the company of two other students during school hours by an assistant principal. This school official testified that as he approached them 'one of the fellows jumped up and put something down, ran his hand down in his pants.' The principal then took the three students to his school office and directed them to empty their pockets. Defendant complied and removed less than an ounce of marijuana from his jacket pocket, for which he was charged and convicted of a misdemeanor in the Fulton Criminal Court by the trial judge, a jury trial having been waived. A motion to suppress this evidence was denied. Held:

We are confronted with the issue of whether the restraints of the Fourth Amendment and the exclusionary rule has application to the relationship present here, i.e., school administrator and student. If this had been a police search there is no question that the evidence seized would have had to be suppressed, as there is no probable cause present sufficient to warrant a search of the person of the defendant.

The first question is whether a school official is a governmental agent or a private person. If the latter, then the Fourth Amendment has no application as it has been held that a search by a private person does not fall within the Fourth Amendment and the exclusionary rule. Burdeau v. McDowell, 256 U.S. 465, 41 S.Ct. 574, 65 L.Ed. 1048. This is a question of first impression in Georgia. It has, however, been the subject of recent judicial decisions in courts of other states. Some have held that a public school officer is not a governmental official subject to the restraints of the Fourth Amendment. See Mercer v. State (Tex.Civ.App.), 450 S.W.2d 715. Others hold that a public school official is a governmental agent. State v. Baccino (Del.), 282 A.2d 869.

In Georgia the public schools were created by constitutional mandate. Code Ann. § 2-6401, Const. art. VIII, sec. I, par. 1. The public schools are governed by boards of education who are empowered with authority to control and manage the respective school systems. Code § 32-901. All teachers, principals and other professional personnel are employed by local boards of education. Code Ann. § 32-607. Taxes are levied and expended for the support and maintenance of public schools and public education to include the salaries of the employees. Code Ann. § 2-7501, Const. art. VIII, § XII, par. 1. A teachers' retirement system is provided for by statute, and power to fund it by means of taxation is authorized by our Constitution. Code Ann. § 2-5502, Const. art. VII, § II, par. 2 and Code Ann. Ch. 32-29. From the foregoing constitutional provisions and the statutes, the conclusion is inescapable...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • State v. Young
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 20 Mayo 1975
    ...violated the Fourth Amendment and that the student's motion to suppress the marijuana should therefore have been granted. Young v. State, 132 Ga.App. 790, 209 S.E.2d 96. The Court of Appeals wrote that '. . . we cannot in view of the Fourth Amendment, grant a school official, when acting as......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT