Bankers' Health & Accident Ass'n v. Wilkes
Decision Date | 05 February 1919 |
Docket Number | (No. 1464.) |
Citation | 209 S.W. 230 |
Parties | BANKERS' HEALTH & ACCIDENT ASS'N v. WILKES. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Garza County; W. R. Spencer, Judge.
Suit by Mrs. Lillie Wilkes against the Bankers' Health & Accident Association. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Judgment affirmed.
Samuel Schwartz, of Houston, and W. F. Kelly, of Post, for appellant.
Shurtleff & Cummings, of Waco, and Chas. L. Black, of Austin, for appellee.
This suit was filed against appellant upon a policy of insurance issued to the husband of appellee, William A. Wilkes. Appellee prayed for judgment for $5.000, the face of the policy, and for the statutory penalties provided by Rev. St. 1911, art. 4746. The trial was before a jury, resulting in a verdict in favor of appellee for the full amount claimed in the petition.
Under the first assignment appellant says there is error in the court's action in overruling its motion for a continuance. The suit was filed April 24, 1918. Appellant was cited April 30th. The motion was filed on June 3d. The statement of facts shows that appellee's husband died December 19, 1917 as a result of a gunshot wound which appellee claims was accidental, entitling her to recover under the policy. Appellant's contention is that appellee is not entitled to recover because her husband suicided, or that his death was caused by the voluntary exposure of himself to danger. Immediately after the pistol which killed Wilkes was fired, appellee fled to the home of a neighbor, and it appears from the statement of facts under intense excitement and while frantic with grief made statements to a number of witnesses concerning the occurrence. The application for continuance is filed on account of the absence of four of the witnesses, all females, who heard her make the statements. About 10 days after the death of the husband, on December 19, 1917, a representative of the company went to the town of Post, where appellee resided, and made an investigation of the circumstances surrounding the death, and after the investigation declined to pay appellee anything under the policy. These witnesses were never subpœnaed, nor has any effort ever been made by appellant to take their depositions. It was not shown that Miss White, who it is alleged was sick, was too ill during the entire 30 days to answer interrogatories. Appellant has shown no diligence whatever to procure the testimony of the witnesses, and its application fails to state that it has used due diligence. Not being a statutory application under all the circumstances, it was addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, who qualified the bill by stating that the testimony, if secured, would be cumulative. We think the court did not err in overruling the application.
Appellant asked the court to direct a verdict in its favor, and the court's refusal is made the basis of the third and several subsequent assignments. It is contended under this assignment that there is nothing in the record to sustain the theory of an accidental shooting, and that the overwhelming weight of the testimony indicates clearly that Wilkes' death was the result of voluntary exposure to danger or suicide. In the first place, where it is shown that the deceased met his death as the result of external and violent means, there arises a presumption against suicide. The force of this presumption is to place upon the appellant the burden of establishing in this case that Wilkes' death was caused by his own hand, or by voluntarily exposing himself to danger. It was shown by the testimony of appellee that she had arranged with her husband to do some Christmas shopping on the afternoon of December 19th, and he told her to ring him up at his place of business after she reached the business district and he would join her there and assist her in her shopping, that she went to town about 6:45 p. m., called him from Dowdy's store to meet her at Warren's Drug Store, and that he came in to the drug store in a few moments. She left their children at home in charge of two girls who lived in the neighborhood, and who had agreed to care for them during her absence. She says they were shopping for more than an hour; made several purchases in the way of Christmas presents for the children, and it appears that he took an active interest in the matter. She testified:
John R. Williams, who had been associated with the deceased in business, saw him late in the afternoon, and testified:
Vida Hunter, one of the little girls who kept the children while appellee was shopping, testified:
The appellee had testified that her husband was drinking on the afternoon in question, and on cross-examination testified:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
McKeon v. National Casualty Co.
... ... 336; ... Robinson v. U. S. Mut. Acc. Assn., 68 F. 825; ... Travelers' Ins. Co. v. Dupree (Ala. Ct ... Business Men's Ass'n, ... 133 Ark. 163; Bankers Health & Acc. Ass'n v ... Wilkers, 209 S.W. 230; Vernon ... Ins. Co., 108 Kans ... 516; Preferred Accident Ins. Co. v. Fielding, 35 ... Colo. 19; Railway Mail ... ...
-
Federal Life Ins. Co. v. Wilkes
...from a self-inflicted wound causing death. In many of its features the evidence is the same as in the case of Banker's Health & Accident Ass'n v. Wilkes, 209 S. W. 230. The appellant presents five assignments of error, assailing the action of the court in instructing the jury to find the is......
-
Langlitz v. American Nat. Ins. Co.
...940, affirmed, Tex.Com.App., 29 S.W.2d 944; Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Ford, 61 Tex.Civ.App. 412, 130 S.W. 769; Bankers' Health & Acc. Ass'n v. Wilkes, Tex. Civ.App., 209 S.W. 230; Fort Worth Mut. Benev. Ass'n v. Jennings, Tex.Civ.App., 283 S.W. 910; Home Benefit Ass'n v. Buro, Tex.Civ.App., 1......
-
Becker v. Interstate Business Men's Acc. Ass'n of Des Moines, Iowa
... ... defendant, a mutual assessment health and accident ... association incorporated under the laws ... Robinson (Tex. Civ. App.) 187 S.W. 215; ... Bankers' Health & Accident Ass'n v. Wilkes (Tex ... Civ. App.) ... ...