Whitney v. Robertson
Citation | 21 F. 566 |
Parties | WHITNEY and others v. ROBERTSON, Collector, etc. |
Decision Date | 19 September 1884 |
Court | United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. Southern District of New York |
Charles Stewart Davison, for plaintiffs.
Elihu Root, U.S. Dist. Atty., and Saml. B. Clark, for defendants.
The questions raised by the demurrer are the same considered in the case of Bartram v. Robertson, 15 F. 212, and for the reasons stated in the opinion there delivered the demurrer is sustained.
Judgment is ordered for the defendant.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kelly v. Hedden
...are the same considered in the cases of Bartram v. Robertson, 15 F. 212, (recently affirmed in the supreme court, 7 S.Ct. 1115;) Whitney v. Robertson, 21 F. 566, and v. Robertson, 27 F. 737; and, for the reasons stated in the opinions there delivered, the demurrer is sustained. Judgment is ......
-
Netherclift v. Robertson
...The court should hesitate long before dealing such a staggering blow to our revenue. This decision was afterwards followed in Whitney v. Robertson, 21 F. 566, the treaty being under consideration. The latter case is in all respects similar to the case in hand, except that it arose prior to ......