Whitney v. Robertson

Citation21 F. 566
PartiesWHITNEY and others v. ROBERTSON, Collector, etc.
Decision Date19 September 1884
CourtUnited States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. Southern District of New York

Charles Stewart Davison, for plaintiffs.

Elihu Root, U.S. Dist. Atty., and Saml. B. Clark, for defendants.

WALLACE, J.

The questions raised by the demurrer are the same considered in the case of Bartram v. Robertson, 15 F. 212, and for the reasons stated in the opinion there delivered the demurrer is sustained.

Judgment is ordered for the defendant.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Kelly v. Hedden
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • July 23, 1887
    ...are the same considered in the cases of Bartram v. Robertson, 15 F. 212, (recently affirmed in the supreme court, 7 S.Ct. 1115;) Whitney v. Robertson, 21 F. 566, and v. Robertson, 27 F. 737; and, for the reasons stated in the opinions there delivered, the demurrer is sustained. Judgment is ......
  • Netherclift v. Robertson
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • June 19, 1886
    ...The court should hesitate long before dealing such a staggering blow to our revenue. This decision was afterwards followed in Whitney v. Robertson, 21 F. 566, the treaty being under consideration. The latter case is in all respects similar to the case in hand, except that it arose prior to ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT