McGrew v. Missouri Pac. Ry. Co.
Decision Date | 14 February 1893 |
Citation | 114 Mo. 210,21 S.W. 463 |
Parties | McGREW v. MISSOURI PAC. RY. CO. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Rev. St. 1889, § 2639, provides that railroad corporations shall print schedules showing the rates of freight established by them, not to exceed the maximum rates established by law; that copies shall be posted in every depot, and filed with the railroad commissioners; and that from the date of such filing the rates scheduled shall not be in excess of statutory maximum rates thereafter in force, and shall be deemed the established rates until changed as provided by this act. Section 2631 provides that all railroads of the state shall be common carriers, and prohibits unreasonable charges. Section 2643 provides that on violation of these sections the person injured may recover three times the amount of damages sustained. Held, in an action to recover penalties for charging plaintiff unreasonable rates on coal shipped by him over defendant railroad company's line, that a petition which failed to allege that the rates charged were in excess of the rates fixed by defendant and filed with the railroad commissioners and posted in defendant's depots, and which also failed to state that the charges were in excess of the maximum rates fixed by the railroad commissioners or by the statute, stated no cause of action.
Appeal from circuit court, Johnson county; Charles W. Sloan, Judge.
Action by James C. McGrew against the Missouri Pacific Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed.
H. S. Priest, for appellant. Graves & Aull, for respondent.
This is a suit to recover penalties for charging plaintiff unreasonable rates upon coal shipped by him over defendant's road from Myrick to divers other points on its road, to wit, Kansas City, Levasy, Adams, Lexington, and Independence, Mo., during the years 1887, 1888, and 1889. The petition contains 256 counts for as many different causes of action, claiming in the aggregate as overcharges and unreasonable the sum of $2,198, and prays that these amounts be tripled, and, in addition thereto, a reasonable attorney's fee. The action is based upon sections 1 and 10 of an act of the legislature passed in 1887, entitled "An act to regulate railroad corporations," (sections 2631, 2643, Rev. St. 1889.) The first count is a sample of all of the other counts of the petition, the only difference being in the date of shipment, the points from which the shipment was made, together with the variations in charge in the different shipments. It is as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
McGrew v. Missouri Pac. Ry. Co.
...prescribing the rights, powers and duties of such railroad companies. Sections 1136, 1137, 1138, Rev. St. 1899 ; McGrew v. Mo. Pac. Ry. Co., 114 Mo. 210, 21 S. W. 463 ; Railroad v. Smith, supra ; McCully v. Railroad, 212 Mo., loc. cit. 17, 18, 110 S. W. 711; Winsor Coal Co. v. C. & A. Ry. C......
-
Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Blind
...act was enacted in Indiana. Tift v. Southern, etc., Co., supra; Young v. Kansas, etc., Co. (1889) 33 Mo. App. 509;McGrew v. Missouri, etc., Co. (1893) 114 Mo. 210, 21 S. W. 463;Winsor, etc., Co. v. Chicago, etc., Co. (C. C. 1892) 52 Fed. 716; Railroad Co. v. People, 77 Ill. 443;Interstate C......
-
Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company v. Blind
... ... Kirby (1912), 225 U.S. 155, 32 S.Ct. 648, 56 L.Ed ... 1033, Ann. Cas. 1914A, 501; Texas Pac. R. Co. v ... Mugg (1906), 202 U.S. 242, 26 S.Ct. 628, 50 L.Ed ... 1011; Arthur v. Texas, ... Co. v. Cramer (1914), 232 ... U.S. 490, 34 S.Ct. 383, 58 L.Ed. 697; Missouri, ... etc., R. Co. v. Harriman Bros. (1913), ... 227 U.S. 657, 33 S.Ct. 397, 57 L.Ed. 690; ... Co., supra ; Young v ... Kansas City, etc., R. Co. (1899), 33 Mo.App. 509; ... McGrew v. Missouri Pac. R. Co. (1893), 114 ... Mo. 210, 21 S.W. 463; Winsor Coal Co. v ... ...
-
McGrew v. Missouri Pacific Ry. Co.
...by passing many other statutes prescribing the rights, powers and duties of such railroad companies. [R. S. 1899, secs. 1136-8; McGrew v. Railroad, 114 Mo. 210; Railroad v. Smith, supra; McCully v. Railroad, Mo. 1 and 18; Winsor Coal Co. v. Railroad, 52 F. 716; Cohn v. Railroad, 181 Mo. 30.......