Morrison v. United States
Decision Date | 02 February 1914 |
Docket Number | 2295. |
Citation | 212 F. 29 |
Parties | MORRISON et al. v. UNITED STATES. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Mark Norris, of Grand Rapids, Mich., and R. Sleight, of Portland Or., for appellants.
Clarence L. Reames, U.S. Atty., and Everett A. Johnson, Asst. U.S Atty., both of Portland, Or.
Before GILBERT, ROSS, and MORROW, Circuit Judges.
The sole question in this case is whether the lands here in controversy, which constitute a part of section 16, township 3 south, range 6 east of the Willamette meridian, in the state of Oregon, passed to that state, and through it to its grantees, prior to the attempted withdrawal of the said lands from any disposition by the executive department of the government.
The act of Congress of August 14, 1848 (9 Stat. 323, c. 177,) entitled 'An act to establish the territorial government of Oregon,' provided in its twentieth section:
'That when the lands in the said territory shall be surveyed under the direction of the government of the United States, preparatory to bringing the same into market, sections numbered sixteen and thirty-six in each township in said territory shall be, and the same is hereby, reserved for the purpose of being applied to schools in said territory, and in the states and territories hereafter to be erected out of the same.'
In the act of Congress of September 27, 1850 (9 Stat. 496, c. 76), entitled 'An act to create the office of Surveyor General of the Public Lands in Oregon, and to provide for the survey, and to make donations to settlers of the said public lands,' it was provided, among other things:
-- and after making certain donations of public lands to certain specifically described settlers, declared, in its ninth section, as follows:
'That no claim to a donation right under the provisions of this act, upon sections sixteen or thirty-six, shall be valid or allowed, if the residence and cultivation upon which the same is founded shall have commenced after the survey of the same; nor shall such claim attach to any tract or parcel of land selected for a military post, or within one mile thereof, or to any other land reserved for governmental purposes, unless the residence and cultivation thereof shall have commenced previous to the selection or reservation of the same for such purposes.'
By its act of February 19, 1851 (9 Stat. 568, c. 10), entitled 'An act to authorize the legislative assemblies of the territories of Oregon and Minnesota to take charge of the school lands in said territories, and for other purposes,' Congress enacted:
'That the Governors and legislative assemblies of the territories of Oregon and Minnesota be, and they are hereby, authorized to make such laws and needful regulations as they shall deem most expedient to protect from injury and waste sections numbered sixteen and thirty-six in said territories, reserved in each township for the support of schools therein.'
By its act of February 14, 1859 (11 Stat. 383, c. 33), entitled 'An act for the admission of Oregon into the Union,' Congress provided, among other things, as follows:
The propositions specifically stated in section 4 of the act of February 14, 1859, as well as the aforesaid acts respecting the school sections, were, according to the stipulation of facts entered into by and between the respective parties to the present case, accepted by an act of the legislative assembly of the state of Oregon of June 3, 1859 (Laws, 1st Extra Sess. p. 36).
The stipulation shows these further facts: Prior to May 27, 1902, the lands in controversy were unsurveyed. On that day a field survey of their east boundary was made, and on June 2d following the north, west, and south boundaries thereof were surveyed, and the said section 16 subdivided according to the rules of the Land Office for surveying the lands of the government. This field survey was approved by the United States Surveyor General for the state of Oregon June 2, 1903, and on the 8th of the same month that officer transmitted copies of the plat of the survey and field notes to the Commissioner of the General Land Office at Washington, which survey was accepted by the Commissioner January 31, 1906. On November 16, 1907, the Commissioner directed the Surveyor General to place a plat of the survey in the field, in the local land office of the United States at Portland, Or., which was on the same day accordingly filed in that office. Shortly prior to the acceptance by the Commissioner of the survey mentioned, to wit, on the 16th day of December, 1905, the Secretary of the Interior made an order temporarily withdrawing, for forestry purposes, from al forms of disposition whatsoever except under the mineral laws of the United States--
'all the vacant and unappropriated public lands within the areas specifically described in that certain letter of the Commissioner of the General Land Office, of date December 12, 1905, to the Secretary of the Interior, including all of township three (3) south, range six (6) east of the Willamette meridian.'
In December, 1905, a telegram was sent by the Commissioner of the General Land Office to the register and receiver of the United...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Merrill v. Bishop
...appropriation to the State.' The court cites Cooper v. Roberts, 18 How. 173, 15 L.Ed. 338, and that case was followed in Morrison v. United States, 9 Cir., 212 F. 29. The rule has been modified as to unsurveyed public land. See United States v. State of Wyoming, 331 U.S. 440, 67 S.Ct. 1319,......