Borough of Waynesburg v. Van Scyoc

Decision Date29 September 1965
Citation419 Pa. 104,213 A.2d 216
PartiesBOROUGH OF WAYNESBURG v. Ronald L. VAN SCYOC, Manager, Greene County Farm Bureau Cooperative Association, Appellant.
CourtPennsylvania Supreme Court

Putney & Killian, David Putney, Harrisburg, for appellant.

William P. Thomas, Jr., Pollock, Pollock & Thomas, Waynesburg, for appellee.

Richard C. Fox, James H. King, McNees, Wallace & Nurick, Harrisburg, for amicus curiae.

Before BELL, C. J., and MUSMANNO, JONES, COHEN, EAGEN, O'BRIEN and ROBERTS, JJ.

COHEN, Justice.

Ronald L. Van Scyoc (Van Scyoc) is the manager of the Greene County Farm Bureau Cooperative Association. As such, he was charged by the Borough of Waynesburg with violations of its municipal ordinance (enacted annually in 1960, 1961, 1962 and 1963) imposing a mercantile tax for failure to file the annual mercantile tax return required by the ordinance. He was found guilty of the charge and apparently sentenced to pay a fine of $100.00. 1

Van Scyoc then filed a petition for an appeal with the Court of Quarter Sessions of Greene County. The appeal was allowed, and, following hearing, that court found Van Scyoc guilty despite his contention that the cooperative association was exempt from the local tax because of its payment of corporate net income tax to the Commonwealth.

On further appeal to the Superior Court, the contention of Van Scyoc was again rejected and the judgment of the Court of Quarter Sessions affirmed. 204 Pa.Super. 565, 205 A.2d 683 (1964). We allowed an appeal to this Court.

We do not pass upon the merits of this case. The decision of the Superior Court must be vacated, the judgment of the Court of Quarter Sessions vacated and the case remanded to the latter court with instructions to dismiss Van Scyoc's appeal. It is now the settled law of this Commonwealth that an action for violation of a municipal ordinance is civil in nature and that an appeal from a determination of guilt and a judgment imposing a penalty thereunder will lie only to the court of common pleas. Commonwealth v. Ashenfelder, 413 Pa. 517, 198 A.2d 514 (1964). This is a question of jurisdiction and quarter sessions has no jurisdiction in such a situation. Therefore, it had no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal of Van Scyoc in this case.

The order of the Superior Court and the judgment of the Court of Quarter Sessions of Greene County are vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Quarter Sessions of Greene County with instructions to enter...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • City of Philadelphia v. Kenny
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court
    • February 8, 1977
    ...of Pennsylvania that the prosecution for violation of a municipal ordinance is procedurally a civil case. E.g., Waynesburg Borough v. van Scyoc, 419 Pa. 104, 213 A.2d 216 (1965); Commonwealth v. Ashenfelder, 413 Pa. 517, 198 A.2d 514 (1964); Philadelphia v. Home Agency, Inc., 4 Pa.Cmwlth. 1......
  • Lehigh Valley Cooperative Farmers v. Com.
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court
    • November 14, 1972
    ...of determining that tax refund to which Lehigh is entitled under this Opinion. 1 Vacated on grounds not relating to merits, 419 Pa. 104, 213 A.2d 216 (1965).2 It should be noted that in 1967 the Legislature amended subsection (a) by increasing the time for filing from eighteen months to thr......
  • Commonwealth v. Badman
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court
    • July 9, 1975
    ... ... rel. Ransom Township v. Mascheska, supra; Waynesburg ... Borough v. Van Scyoc, 419 Pa. 104, 213 A.2d 216 (1965); ... Commonwealth v. Ashenfelder, 413 ... ...
  • Lehigh Val. Co-op. Farmers v. Com.
    • United States
    • Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court
    • April 5, 1973
    ...entered in favor of Lehigh Valley Cooperative Farmers in the amount of $281,247.39. 1 Vacated on grounds not relating to merits, 419 Pa. 104, 213 A.2d 216 (1965).2 It should be noted that in 1967 the Legislature amended subsection (a) by increasing the time for filing from eighteen months t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT