Commonwealth v. Lehman, 69 MAL 2019
| Citation | 215 A.3d 967 (Table) |
| Decision Date | 25 June 2019 |
| Docket Number | No. 69 MAL 2019,69 MAL 2019 |
| Parties | COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Michael A. LEHMAN, Respondent |
| Court | United States State Supreme Court of Pennsylvania |
215 A.3d 967 (Table)
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner
v.
Michael A. LEHMAN, Respondent
No. 69 MAL 2019
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
June 25, 2019
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
AND NOW, this 25th day of June, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue as stated by petitioner is:
Whether the Pennsylvania Superior Court erred as a matter of law by holding that the costs relating to contested expert testimony in a contested resentencing do not constitute costs of prosecution under 16 P.S. § 1403,[ ]* and are ineligible for imposition upon a defendant reimbursement as part of a sentence as a matter of law rather than the sentencing court's discretion[?]
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
Commonwealth v. Lehman
...reimbursement as part of a sentence as a matter of law rather than the sentencing court's discretion[?] Commonwealth v. Lehman , ––– Pa. ––––, 215 A.3d 967, 968 (2019) (per curiam ).Whether costs relating to sentencing, and costs relating to re-sentencing, constitute "costs of prosecution a......
-
Bourgeois v. Snow Time, Inc., 768 MAL 2018
...215 A.3d 967 (Table)Ray M. BOURGEOIS and Mary Ann I. Bourgeois, Petitionersv.SNOW TIME, INC. and Ski Roundtop Operating Corporation, RespondentsNo. 768 MAL 2018Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.June 25, 2019ORDERPER CURIAM.AND NOW, this 25th day of June, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appe......