USA v. Enas, 99-10049
| Decision Date | 28 July 2000 |
| Docket Number | No. 99-10049,99-10049 |
| Citation | 219 F.3d 1138 |
| Parties | (9th Cir. 2000) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICHAEL L. ENAS, Defendant-Appellee. Office of the Circuit Executive Filed |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Before: HUG, Chief Judge.
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
United States. v. Johnson
... ... Judge Tashima is not the first member of our court to take this position. See, e.g., United States v. Enas, 204 F.3d 915, 920 (9th Cir. 2000) (dismissing the legal analysis of an earlier panel as "not necessary to the court's decision"), reh'g en banc ... ...
- Bamberg v. State, 2D05-4769.
1 books & journal articles
-
The keys to the castle: a new standard for warrantless home searches in United States v. Knights.
...v. United States, 358 U.S. 307, 313 (1959) (quoting Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132, 162 (1925)). (8.) United States v. Knights, 219 F.3d 1138 (9th Cir. (9.) See id. at 1141. (10.) Id. at 1141-42. Judge Fernandez cited the rich lineage supporting the special protection afforded the h......