People v. Joines, 55686
| Decision Date | 27 June 1974 |
| Docket Number | No. 55686,55686 |
| Citation | 219 N.W.2d 432,392 Mich. 764 |
| Parties | PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Lee JOINES, Defendant-Appellant. 392 Mich. 764, 219 N.W.2d 432 |
| Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
Before the Entire Bench.
ORDER
On order of the Court, the in pro. per. petition for writ of habeas corpus by defendant-appellant is treated as a delayed application for leave to appeal and, so treated and considered, the same is hereby granted. The Court, sua sponte pursuant to GCR 1963, 865.1(7), hereby remands the cause to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in view of People v. White, 390 Mich. 245, 212 N.W.2d 222 (1973).
FITZGERALD, J., not participating.
To continue reading
Request your trial
7 cases
-
Michigan v. Mosley
...statement be suppressed as evidence. 51 Mich.App. 105, 214 N.W.2d 564. After further appeal was denied by the Michigan Supreme Court, 392 Mich. 764, the State filed a petition for certiorari here. We granted the writ because of the important constitutional question presented. 419 U.S. 1119,......
-
Watson v. State
...and reversed, People v. Mosley, 51 Mich.App. 105, 214 N.W.2d 564 (1974); 3 further review was denied by the Michigan Supreme Court, 392 Mich. 764 (1974). Id., 423 U.S., at 98-99, 96 S.Ct., at Having granted certiorari, the Supreme Court framed its issue as follows: "[W]hether the conduct of......
-
People v. Markham, 57205
...(1967)) would be applied prospectively: 'the processing of current criminal calendars would be disrupted.'16 390 Mich. 809 (1973); 392 Mich. 764 (1974).17 People v. Joines (On Remand), 55 Mich.App. 334, 222 N.W.2d 230 (1974); People v. Davenport (On Remand), 51 Mich.App. 484, 215 N.W.2d 702......
-
Keating Intern. Corp. v. Orion County
...upon competent, material and substantial evidence. The trial court was therefore affirmed. We granted leave to appeal June 27, 1974. 392 Mich. 764. II--EFFECT OF I concur with the Court of Appeals and find that the trial judge erred in failing to consider the amended zoning ordinance. 'A fu......
Request a trial to view additional results