State ex rel. Crow v. Carothers

Decision Date10 May 1920
Citation222 S.W. 1043,204 Mo.App. 209
PartiesSTATE EX REL. W. I. CROW, Respondent, v. J. C. CAROTHERS, Appellant
CourtKansas Court of Appeals

Appeal from Adair Circuit Court.--Hon. James A. Cooley, Judge.

Reversed.

W. F Frank for respondent.

Alex. Doneghy for appellant.

OPINION

ELLISON, P. J.--

This is a proceeding in mandamus wherein relator seeks to compel respondent, who is city clerk, to certify to the common council of the City of Kirksville a certain petition for an election to elect a successor to one O. M. Hutchinson as one of the councilmen for said city. After a hearing a peremptory writ was ordered by the trial court.

Kirksville is a city of the third class and this proceeding is founded upon section 19, Laws 1913, p. 528, known as the "recall" statute, which reads as follows: "The procedure to effect the removal of an incumbent of an elective office shall be as follows: A petition signed by electors entitled to vote for a successor to the incumbent sought to be removed, equal in number to at least twenty-five per centum of the entire vote for all candidates for the office of mayor at the last preceding general municipal election, demanding an election of a successor of the person sought to be removed shall be filed with the city clerk which petition shall contain a general statement of the grounds for which the removal is sought. . . . One of the signers of each such paper shall make oath before an officer competent to administer oaths that the statements therein made are true as he believes and that each signature to the paper appended is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. Within ten days from the date of filing such petition the city clerk shall examine and from the voters' register ascertain whether or not said petition is signed by the requisite number of qualified electors, and if necessary, the council shall allow him extra help for that purpose; and he shall attach to said petition his certificate, showing the result of said examination. If by the clerk's certificate the petition is shown to be insufficient, it may be amended within ten days from the date of said certificate. The clerk shall, within ten days after such amendment, make like examination of the amended petition, and if his certificate shall show the same to be insufficient, it shall be returned to the person filing the same, without prejudice, however, to the filing of a new petition to the same effect."

The respondent clerk claims that the application and alternative writ fail to state a case or ground of complaint, against him, under this statute. It will be noticed that the statute requires the city clerk within ten days from the date of the filing of the petition, to "examine and from the voters register ascertain whether or not said petition is signed by the requisite number of qualified electors," and he shall attach to the petition his certificate, showing the result of his examination.

Neither the application nor the alternative writ contain an averment that the persons signing the petition for "recall" as qualified voters were shown to be such by the "voters register," which the statute requires as a necessary requisite to make them qualified petitioners for recall.

Our law is a copy of the statute of Oklahoma, and in adopting it, we adopted the construction given to it by the courts of that State. [State ex rel. v. Miles, 210 Mo. 127, 109 S.W. 595; Knight v. Rawlings, 205 Mo. 412, 433, 104 S.W. 38.] The Supreme Court of that State construed the statute as meaning that the alleged qualified voter, signing as a petitioner, must appear on the registration books. The court's language is that "the registration books will disclose to him (the clerk) whether the names appearing upon the petitionars qualified electors as shown thereby. His rule for determining the qualifications of the electors to sign the petition is limited by the act to the name appearing on the registration books. The election returns disclose to him the number of electors participating in the last preceding vote cast for the candidates and enable him to ascertain whether the number signing the petition was equal in amount to twenty-five per cent thereof, . . . The ordinance under which the clerk is required to act was drawn with the purpose in view of making his duties as simple as they could be. The evidence given by the registration books established a certain and ready foundation as a basis, and was doubtless deemed to be the best and...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT